What changed in India's villages since 2011
6,57,870 villages. For 4,56,712 of them we can compare the Census 2011 count against the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey and show the change. For the rest we say why we can't.
States
| State | Villages | Change measurable | Avg. population change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Uttar Pradesh | 1,07,149 | 85,484 (89%) | +29.0% |
| Madhya Pradesh | 55,834 | 46,079 (90%) | +22.1% |
| Odisha | 51,922 | 26,966 (58%) | +15.4% |
| Rajasthan | 46,506 | 32,762 (76%) | +21.9% |
| Bihar | 45,406 | 34,783 (89%) | +24.9% |
| Maharashtra | 44,229 | 23,068 (57%) | +13.3% |
| West Bengal | 40,985 | 34,140 (92%) | +20.1% |
| Karnataka | 33,042 | 18,771 (70%) | +17.8% |
| Jharkhand | 32,907 | 23,108 (80%) | +21.0% |
| Assam | 27,941 | 19,781 (81%) | +23.9% |
| Himachal Pradesh | 20,940 | 15,232 (87%) | +28.8% |
| Chhattisgarh | 20,369 | 15,618 (80%) | +18.5% |
| Gujarat | 18,588 | 8,944 (51%) | +15.8% |
| Andhra Pradesh | 18,154 | 12,041 (74%) | +12.1% |
| Uttarakhand | 16,972 | 11,148 (74%) | +20.9% |
| Tamil Nadu | 16,305 | 10,734 (72%) | +18.6% |
| Punjab | 12,882 | 10,053 (84%) | +12.4% |
| Telangana | 10,332 | 3,714 (39%) | -1.0% |
| Haryana | 7,295 | 5,809 (92%) | +22.4% |
| Meghalaya | 6,895 | 5,477 (93%) | +39.2% |
| Jammu And Kashmir | 6,670 | 4,396 (77%) | +21.6% |
| Arunachal Pradesh | 5,594 | 3,369 (67%) | +36.9% |
| Manipur | 3,905 | 1,938 (85%) | +28.4% |
| Nagaland | 1,611 | 894 (83%) | +48.1% |
| Kerala | 1,467 | 270 (27%) | -4.5% |
| Mizoram | 1,076 | 574 (94%) | +25.9% |
| Tripura | 908 | 606 (76%) | +11.7% |
| Andaman And Nicobar Islands | 557 | 159 (90%) | +14.7% |
| Sikkim | 458 | 346 (84%) | +11.1% |
| Goa | 399 | 179 (56%) | +20.5% |
| Ladakh | 240 | 209 (89%) | +17.7% |
| Delhi | 112 | — | — |
| The Dadra And Nagar Haveli And Daman And Diu | 101 | 60 (74%) | +23.0% |
| Puducherry | 90 | — | — |
| Lakshadweep | 21 | — | — |
| Chandigarh | 5 | — | — |
| Dadra And Nagar Haveli | 3 | — | — |
Why “change measurable” is not 100%. In about 15% of villages
the 2020 survey simply restates the Census 2011 population, so nothing was
actually measured. We exclude those rather than print a growth rate of zero.
Read the method.