Biggest population changes in Guntur district
Computed from 384 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Guntur district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nidanampadu | 536 | 1,258 | +134.7% |
| 2 | Neelagangavaram | 1,680 | 3,300 | +96.4% |
| 3 | Vallabhapuram | 6,753 | 13,230 | +95.9% |
| 4 | Chebrolu | 11,626 | 21,740 | +87.0% |
| 5 | Tellabadu | 903 | 1,453 | +60.9% |
| 6 | Tripurapuram | 1,034 | 1,650 | +59.6% |
| 7 | Lingapuram | 4,064 | 6,251 | +53.8% |
| 8 | Dharanikota | 7,534 | 11,380 | +51.0% |
| 9 | Chowtapapayapalem | 1,404 | 2,064 | +47.0% |
| 10 | Murthuzapuram | 2,284 | 3,352 | +46.8% |
| 11 | Muthupalle Agraharam | 1,463 | 2,124 | +45.2% |
| 12 | Peesapadu | 2,342 | 3,300 | +40.9% |
| 13 | Kunkalagunta | 8,745 | 12,229 | +39.8% |
| 14 | Mulakalur | 1,681 | 2,344 | +39.4% |
| 15 | Thimmayapalem | 2,925 | 4,065 | +39.0% |
| 16 | Ummadivaram | 942 | 1,307 | +38.8% |
| 17 | Sarikondapalem | 1,806 | 2,490 | +37.9% |
| 18 | Gundalapadu | 2,205 | 3,010 | +36.5% |
| 19 | Phirangipuram | 16,365 | 22,000 | +34.4% |
| 20 | Narasingapadu | 2,054 | 2,759 | +34.3% |
Villages that shrank most in Guntur district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bapatla West (R) | 8,719 | 5,295 | -39.3% |
| 2 | Kanumarlapudi | 6,222 | 3,792 | -39.0% |
| 3 | Sangupalem Kodur | 2,800 | 1,708 | -39.0% |
| 4 | Reddigudem | 4,629 | 2,844 | -38.6% |
| 5 | Amudalapalli | 6,923 | 4,254 | -38.5% |
| 6 | Karumanchi | 7,357 | 4,533 | -38.4% |
| 7 | Rajupalem | 4,139 | 2,555 | -38.3% |
| 8 | Gudipadu | 5,279 | 3,280 | -37.9% |
| 9 | Pedamatlapudi | 5,971 | 3,720 | -37.7% |
| 10 | Koditadiparru | 757 | 474 | -37.4% |
| 11 | Kuragallu | 4,340 | 2,740 | -36.9% |
| 12 | Madinapadu | 4,924 | 3,114 | -36.8% |
| 13 | Vaddemgunta | 4,246 | 2,685 | -36.8% |
| 14 | Nemalikallu | 5,812 | 3,680 | -36.7% |
| 15 | Ramapuram | 4,228 | 2,686 | -36.5% |
| 16 | Enugupalem | 4,553 | 2,895 | -36.4% |
| 17 | Pamidipadu | 3,083 | 1,975 | -35.9% |
| 18 | Chintalapudi | 8,223 | 5,277 | -35.8% |
| 19 | Konetipuram | 2,894 | 1,858 | -35.8% |
| 20 | Konanki | 5,894 | 3,796 | -35.6% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
2 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 2 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
4 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.