Biggest population changes in Y.S.R. district
Computed from 572 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Y.S.R. district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pothukurupalle | 522 | 1,300 | +149.0% |
| 2 | Apparajupeta | 825 | 1,912 | +131.8% |
| 3 | Valasapalle | 764 | 1,768 | +131.4% |
| 4 | Simhadripuram | 3,726 | 8,047 | +116.0% |
| 5 | Sitarampuram | 576 | 1,187 | +106.1% |
| 6 | Kondappagaripalle | 621 | 1,210 | +94.8% |
| 7 | Ramachandrapuram | 782 | 1,424 | +82.1% |
| 8 | Thollaganganapalle | 1,153 | 2,058 | +78.5% |
| 9 | Konduruchinraya Samudram | 736 | 1,304 | +77.2% |
| 10 | Gotur | 1,110 | 1,948 | +75.5% |
| 11 | Bahirajapalle | 149 | 250 | +67.8% |
| 12 | Dalavaipalle | 1,228 | 2,050 | +66.9% |
| 13 | Shakarajupalle | 4,078 | 6,725 | +64.9% |
| 14 | Ramasamudram | 1,007 | 1,660 | +64.8% |
| 15 | Kothapalle | 709 | 1,126 | +58.8% |
| 16 | Kalvapalle | 1,665 | 2,598 | +56.0% |
| 17 | Chamaluru | 930 | 1,450 | +55.9% |
| 18 | Chinnasettipalle | 1,117 | 1,730 | +54.9% |
| 19 | Himakuntla | 1,281 | 1,980 | +54.6% |
| 20 | Gollapalle | 323 | 494 | +52.9% |
Villages that shrank most in Y.S.R. district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rayavaram | 7,956 | 4,825 | -39.4% |
| 2 | Buchupalle | 1,581 | 962 | -39.1% |
| 3 | Gadela | 3,627 | 2,216 | -38.9% |
| 4 | Itimarpuram | 6,481 | 3,968 | -38.8% |
| 5 | Peddacheppalle | 5,368 | 3,294 | -38.6% |
| 6 | Pullampeta | 6,006 | 3,692 | -38.5% |
| 7 | South Ramapuram | 3,490 | 2,154 | -38.3% |
| 8 | Mahadevapalle | 1,959 | 1,211 | -38.2% |
| 9 | Ananthapuram | 2,359 | 1,470 | -37.7% |
| 10 | Chinnakampalle | 1,445 | 902 | -37.6% |
| 11 | Velavali | 3,760 | 2,358 | -37.3% |
| 12 | Chinna Orampadu | 9,930 | 6,257 | -37.0% |
| 13 | Chilekampalle | 3,740 | 2,360 | -36.9% |
| 14 | Koduru | 2,808 | 1,773 | -36.9% |
| 15 | Chemullapalle | 4,399 | 2,781 | -36.8% |
| 16 | Pendlimarri | 3,564 | 2,274 | -36.2% |
| 17 | Bidinamcherla | 2,945 | 1,884 | -36.0% |
| 18 | Veeraballe | 8,720 | 5,637 | -35.4% |
| 19 | Ganganapalle | 1,525 | 993 | -34.9% |
| 20 | Ananthapuram | 5,384 | 3,535 | -34.3% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
6 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 1 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
7 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.