GaonData

Biggest population changes in Changlang district

Computed from 172 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Changlang district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Kumung Pothar - II Bordumsa 170 400 +135.3%
2 Singmao Khagam-Miao 218 500 +129.4%
3 (Maithong II/(Namphai II) Khagam-Miao 131 300 +129.0%
4 Rangkatu Changlang 281 637 +126.7%
5 Wakhetna Bordumsa 1,106 2,500 +126.0%
6 Jongrom Yatdam 146 328 +124.7%
7 Songkin I Khagam-Miao 122 274 +124.6%
8 Kaikepathar Khagam-Miao 287 635 +121.3%
9 Sallang Khimiyang 110 238 +116.4%
10 Tikhak Taipi Nampong 104 210 +101.9%
11 Kherempani Bordumsa 400 800 +100.0%
12 Ongman Khagam-Miao 135 270 +100.0%
13 New Sallang Khimiyang 194 380 +95.9%
14 Phaparbari Vijoynagar 317 620 +95.6%
15 Old Jukhi Khimiyang 142 272 +91.5%
16 Kovin Nampong 111 210 +89.2%
17 Topihill Vijoynagar 242 450 +86.0%
18 Hetman Manmao 116 213 +83.6%
19 Hetlong Nampong 121 221 +82.6%
20 Saban(Wawoi) Yatdam 177 310 +75.1%

Villages that shrank most in Changlang district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Khamkai Nampong 439 300 -31.7%
2 Neotan Khagam-Miao 840 600 -28.6%
3 Khagam Singpho Khagam-Miao 203 148 -27.1%
4 Nampong Nampong 479 350 -26.9%
5 Laktong Yatdam 543 415 -23.6%
6 Gandhigram Vijoynagar 1,754 1,380 -21.3%
7 Typong Nampong 174 137 -21.3%
8 Kuttom Khagam-Miao 874 715 -18.2%
9 New Chingsa Khagam-Miao 629 520 -17.3%
10 Wagun - I Bordumsa 444 372 -16.2%
11 New Changlang Changlang 243 204 -16.1%
12 Khauji Potner Bordumsa 531 446 -16.0%
13 Lewang Khagam-Miao 183 160 -12.6%
14 Namgoi Village - III Nampong 134 120 -10.4%
15 New Thamlom Changlang 194 175 -9.8%
16 Pisi Khagam-Miao 128 116 -9.4%
17 Namchik Range Office Complex Khagam-Miao 121 110 -9.1%
18 Jungmaisung - II Changlang 125 116 -7.2%
19 Namphuk Khagam-Miao 318 300 -5.7%
20 Tengmo Nampong 307 290 -5.5%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 55 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 55 excluded in total. How the limits are set.