GaonData

Biggest population changes in East Kameng district

Computed from 147 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in East Kameng district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Kafla Bana 161 400 +148.4%
2 Dokre Gyadi Pipu 161 400 +148.4%
3 Beyong Khenewa 242 592 +144.6%
4 Namchar Bagang Chayangtajo 127 310 +144.1%
5 Fachang Pipu 114 274 +140.3%
6 Attarang Seppa 297 700 +135.7%
7 Jotte Cheda Pipu 201 471 +134.3%
8 Tabri Pipu 188 440 +134.0%
9 Kakukao Seppa 316 739 +133.9%
10 Ligwa Gyadi Pipu 196 450 +129.6%
11 Tadowapa Pipu 116 266 +129.3%
12 Lasak Cheda Pipu 133 300 +125.6%
13 Gyawe Purang Hq. Pipu 133 300 +125.6%
14 Milorang Bameng 262 590 +125.2%
15 Longri Riang Bameng 125 276 +120.8%
16 Jokhia Khenewa 289 635 +119.7%
17 Effa Bameng 108 236 +118.5%
18 Sengriwa Seppa 322 680 +111.2%
19 Pipukoro Bana 158 330 +108.9%
20 Nepuwa Bana 161 330 +105.0%

Villages that shrank most in East Kameng district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Rang Seppa 478 347 -27.4%
2 Lamnio-I (Res) Khenewa 440 320 -27.3%
3 Wallong Khenewa 113 101 -10.6%
4 Nari Camp Sawa 417 375 -10.1%
5 Pampoli Seppa 501 484 -3.4%
6 Chamduk Leyak Bana 149 155 +4.0%
7 Paksa Bameng 188 198 +5.3%
8 Fengche Jayanti Seppa 152 161 +5.9%
9 Wessang- I DIET Complex Seppa 378 402 +6.3%
10 Hara Yangfo Chayangtajo 103 110 +6.8%
11 Tallong � III Seppa 163 175 +7.4%
12 Wessang Seppa 124 135 +8.9%
13 40 K.M. Camp Khenewa 157 175 +11.5%
14 Rengte-Wah Bameng 212 239 +12.7%
15 Neking Seppa 153 173 +13.1%
16 Mebua Camp Seppa 280 320 +14.3%
17 Loffa Seppa 591 683 +15.6%
18 Pakke Camp Khenewa 507 591 +16.6%
19 Sachung Bameng 165 193 +17.0%
20 Tarang Yangse Seppa 105 123 +17.1%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 60 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 60 excluded in total. How the limits are set.