GaonData

Biggest population changes in East Siang district

Computed from 54 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in East Siang district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Muralali/Pillumuk F.Camp Pasighat 203 450 +121.7%
2 Bilat I Ruksin 359 750 +108.9%
3 Sibo Pasighat 160 300 +87.5%
4 12th Mile Ruksin 212 350 +65.1%
5 7th Mile Camp Pasighat 155 250 +61.3%
6 Kemi Check Gate Ruksin 453 700 +54.5%
7 Mikong Ruksin 629 950 +51.0%
8 Lingka Ruksin 234 350 +49.6%
9 Oyan II Ruksin 751 1,100 +46.5%
10 Gune Pasighat 129 180 +39.5%
11 Mangnang Ruksin 431 600 +39.2%
12 Donyi Polo T.E. Ruksin 866 1,200 +38.6%
13 Rengging Pasighat 254 340 +33.9%
14 Ralling Mebo 241 310 +28.6%
15 3rd Mile Pasighat 353 450 +27.5%
16 Remi Ruksin 325 395 +21.5%
17 Tigra Mirbuk I Pasighat 137 166 +21.2%
18 Tajum Pasighat 415 500 +20.5%
19 Mongku Pasighat 372 440 +18.3%
20 Sigar Mebo 399 460 +15.3%

Villages that shrank most in East Siang district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Yagrung I Pasighat 905 550 -39.2%
2 Boying Pasighat 618 404 -34.6%
3 Silluk Mebo 859 590 -31.3%
4 Sika Tode Ruksin 671 535 -20.3%
5 Detak Vill. Ruksin 302 243 -19.5%
6 Rayang Ruksin 844 680 -19.4%
7 Depi Moli Ruksin 358 291 -18.7%
8 Ralung Ruksin 542 450 -17.0%
9 Diking Pasighat 447 375 -16.1%
10 Debing Ruksin 897 800 -10.8%
11 Sibut Pasighat 467 422 -9.6%
12 Ngorlung Ruksin 800 789 -1.4%
13 Namsing Mebo 1,589 1,600 +0.7%
14 Borguli Mebo 664 670 +0.9%
15 Kiyit Mebo 1,237 1,250 +1.1%
16 Aohali Mebo 216 220 +1.9%
17 Bamin Ruksin 1,057 1,080 +2.2%
18 Ranaghat Mebo 102 105 +2.9%
19 Sikabamin Ruksin 1,451 1,500 +3.4%
20 Motum Vill. Mebo 714 740 +3.6%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 2 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 2 excluded in total. How the limits are set.