Biggest population changes in Lohit district
Computed from 19 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Lohit district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kamja | 135 | 216 | +60.0% |
| 2 | 19th Mile Kabruliang | 215 | 327 | +52.1% |
| 3 | Kanjang | 143 | 193 | +35.0% |
| 4 | Karhe | 145 | 189 | +30.3% |
| 5 | Jeko | 449 | 550 | +22.5% |
| 6 | Manthi | 143 | 173 | +21.0% |
| 7 | Kamlang Nagar | 205 | 238 | +16.1% |
| 8 | Mawai - II | 199 | 230 | +15.6% |
| 9 | Old Sunpura | 540 | 623 | +15.4% |
| 10 | Tissue | 216 | 248 | +14.8% |
| 11 | Wakro | 137 | 144 | +5.1% |
| 12 | Thowang | 126 | 132 | +4.8% |
| 13 | Gundri | 163 | 169 | +3.7% |
| 14 | Cibi | 150 | 154 | +2.7% |
| 15 | Hallao | 208 | 209 | +0.5% |
| 16 | Demwe | 826 | 829 | +0.4% |
| 17 | Pukhari | 265 | 262 | -1.1% |
| 18 | 20th Mile Chailiang | 735 | 661 | -10.1% |
| 19 | New Phukari | 112 | 86 | -23.2% |
Villages that shrank most in Lohit district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | New Phukari | 112 | 86 | -23.2% |
| 2 | 20th Mile Chailiang | 735 | 661 | -10.1% |
| 3 | Pukhari | 265 | 262 | -1.1% |
| 4 | Demwe | 826 | 829 | +0.4% |
| 5 | Hallao | 208 | 209 | +0.5% |
| 6 | Cibi | 150 | 154 | +2.7% |
| 7 | Gundri | 163 | 169 | +3.7% |
| 8 | Thowang | 126 | 132 | +4.8% |
| 9 | Wakro | 137 | 144 | +5.1% |
| 10 | Tissue | 216 | 248 | +14.8% |
| 11 | Old Sunpura | 540 | 623 | +15.4% |
| 12 | Mawai - II | 199 | 230 | +15.6% |
| 13 | Kamlang Nagar | 205 | 238 | +16.1% |
| 14 | Manthi | 143 | 173 | +21.0% |
| 15 | Jeko | 449 | 550 | +22.5% |
| 16 | Karhe | 145 | 189 | +30.3% |
| 17 | Kanjang | 143 | 193 | +35.0% |
| 18 | 19th Mile Kabruliang | 215 | 327 | +52.1% |
| 19 | Kamja | 135 | 216 | +60.0% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
8 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
8 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.