GaonData

Biggest population changes in Lower Dibang Valley district

Computed from 105 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Lower Dibang Valley district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Cheta - II Roing 964 2,356 +144.4%
2 Bolung I Roing 129 280 +117.0%
3 Paglam III Dambuk 261 500 +91.6%
4 Kaling II Dambuk 216 400 +85.2%
5 Karsing Roing 109 196 +79.8%
6 Baksek Roing 247 441 +78.5%
7 Maka II Roing 248 435 +75.4%
8 Yagpo Dambuk 204 350 +71.6%
9 Alumo Roing 460 770 +67.4%
10 Tapat Dambuk 123 201 +63.4%
11 Bolik Roing 121 192 +58.7%
12 Rayang I Roing 183 287 +56.8%
13 Asali Roing 181 280 +54.7%
14 Mobang I Roing 154 238 +54.5%
15 Upper Paglam Dambuk 328 500 +52.4%
16 Agamgite - II Roing 108 164 +51.9%
17 Tinali H.Q. Dambuk 401 600 +49.6%
18 Mongkang Roing 212 312 +47.2%
19 Agam Dambuk 144 210 +45.8%
20 Sikkol Dambuk 110 160 +45.5%

Villages that shrank most in Lower Dibang Valley district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Kayi Roing 275 174 -36.7%
2 Koronu Roing 740 509 -31.2%
3 Bangkong Roing 154 114 -26.0%
4 Abongo Roing 529 400 -24.4%
5 Injonu Roing 526 400 -23.9%
6 Lower Paglam Dambuk 655 500 -23.7%
7 Kengkut Roing 159 125 -21.4%
8 Zemi Roing 204 166 -18.6%
9 Chidu Roing 127 117 -7.9%
10 Haru Pahar T.E. Roing 358 330 -7.8%
11 Jeemuh Roing 232 220 -5.2%
12 Bakshek(Doleswar) Roing 264 270 +2.3%
13 Bismaknagar Roing 176 180 +2.3%
14 Turung Roing 299 312 +4.3%
15 Chipuano Roing 134 140 +4.5%
16 Holokbari Roing 147 155 +5.4%
17 Asenga Roing 226 240 +6.2%
18 Old Abali(Abali) Roing 242 260 +7.4%
19 Poblung - I Dambuk 232 250 +7.8%
20 Jia III Roing 128 138 +7.8%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 65 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 65 excluded in total. How the limits are set.