GaonData

Biggest population changes in Lower Subansiri district

Computed from 85 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Lower Subansiri district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Gench Ziro-Ii 155 355 +129.0%
2 Khompu Nyoli Ziro-Ii 118 250 +111.9%
3 Mudang Tage - II Ziro-I 1,021 2,108 +106.5%
4 Taiging Ziro-Ii 284 584 +105.6%
5 Bilo Ziro-Ii 183 376 +105.5%
6 Radhpu Pistana 122 250 +104.9%
7 Lumri Ziro-Ii 181 350 +93.4%
8 Jath Ziro-Ii 218 403 +84.9%
9 Yoglu Pistana 117 215 +83.8%
10 Dem - III Pistana 121 212 +75.2%
11 Manipolyang Ziro-I 198 338 +70.7%
12 Yaizat Ziro-Ii 109 180 +65.1%
13 Passa Ziro-Ii 200 308 +54.0%
14 Diko-Pita Ziro-I 169 250 +47.9%
15 Chun Ziro-Ii 102 145 +42.2%
16 Takhu Sidhi Ziro-I 138 194 +40.6%
17 New Neelam Pistana 193 270 +39.9%
18 Seya Pistana 133 185 +39.1%
19 Yashibo Ziro-I 255 350 +37.3%
20 Diibo Uru Ziro-I 105 138 +31.4%

Villages that shrank most in Lower Subansiri district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Rilingyollo Ziro-I 240 150 -37.5%
2 Pochu Pistana 235 190 -19.1%
3 Upper - Tallo Ziro-Ii 148 125 -15.5%
4 Takampassa Ziro-Ii 126 110 -12.7%
5 Possa Ziro-Ii 508 480 -5.5%
6 Khach Pistana 339 340 +0.3%
7 Doka Paya Ziro-Ii 316 317 +0.3%
8 Toon Ziro-Ii 209 210 +0.5%
9 Nyuch Ziro-Ii 254 257 +1.2%
10 New Pania Pistana 157 160 +1.9%
11 Chulyu Ziro-Ii 204 208 +2.0%
12 Neri Pistana 171 175 +2.3%
13 Khowoo Pistana 127 130 +2.4%
14 Dem - I Pistana 165 169 +2.4%
15 Peet (Upper Z-2) Ziro-Ii 124 127 +2.4%
16 Reru - II Ziro-I 663 680 +2.6%
17 Reru - I Ziro-I 872 900 +3.2%
18 Pania Pistana 150 155 +3.3%
19 Neepco Complex Ziro-Ii 793 820 +3.4%
20 Depo Ziro-Ii 110 118 +7.3%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 93 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 93 excluded in total. How the limits are set.