GaonData

Biggest population changes in Pakke Kessang district

Computed from 33 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Pakke Kessang district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Keko Pakkekessang 135 310 +129.6%
2 Zeraso Pakkekessang 101 169 +67.3%
3 Longpong Pakkekessang 157 261 +66.2%
4 Gumte Pakkekessang 220 358 +62.7%
5 Devegolo Pakkekessang 123 200 +62.6%
6 Pajewa Pakkekessang 106 160 +50.9%
7 Khodaso Pakkekessang 196 295 +50.5%
8 Seramso Pakkekessang 107 160 +49.5%
9 Passo Camp Pakkekessang 121 180 +48.8%
10 Patiwa Pakkekessang 101 150 +48.5%
11 Lower Seijosa Seijosa 479 705 +47.2%
12 Rilloh Pakkekessang 331 483 +45.9%
13 Laluwapa Pakkekessang 152 220 +44.7%
14 Namorah Seijosa 133 187 +40.6%
15 Dipik Seijosa 241 324 +34.4%
16 Hote Veo Pakkekessang 105 140 +33.3%
17 Ngoleka Pakkekessang 305 403 +32.1%
18 Dowla Pakkekessang 107 140 +30.8%
19 Palin Pakkekessang 164 210 +28.1%
20 Bali Basti Seijosa 259 315 +21.6%

Villages that shrank most in Pakke Kessang district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Jolly Seijosa 236 193 -18.2%
2 Passo Seijosa 150 140 -6.7%
3 Palov Pakkekessang 108 101 -6.5%
4 Upper Seijosa Seijosa 1,359 1,368 +0.7%
5 Upper Dikal Mukh Seijosa 231 235 +1.7%
6 Niti Darlong Seijosa 461 471 +2.2%
7 Gumtung Pakkekessang 217 240 +10.6%
8 Sede Pakkekessang 501 560 +11.8%
9 Taoso Pakkekessang 175 196 +12.0%
10 Nangnyu Pakkekessang 116 130 +12.1%
11 Taroyar Pakkekessang 292 330 +13.0%
12 Baliso Seijosa 245 279 +13.9%
13 Pakro Pakkekessang 475 550 +15.8%
14 Bali Basti Seijosa 259 315 +21.6%
15 Palin Pakkekessang 164 210 +28.1%
16 Dowla Pakkekessang 107 140 +30.8%
17 Ngoleka Pakkekessang 305 403 +32.1%
18 Hote Veo Pakkekessang 105 140 +33.3%
19 Dipik Seijosa 241 324 +34.4%
20 Namorah Seijosa 133 187 +40.6%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 25 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 25 excluded in total. How the limits are set.