GaonData

Biggest population changes in Papum Pare district

Computed from 126 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Papum Pare district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Pichola Nyishi (Aniya) Doimukh 104 250 +140.4%
2 Tagik Mengio 120 288 +140.0%
3 Kusuk Mengio 198 470 +137.4%
4 Nakar Mengio 178 420 +136.0%
5 Sarchgai Mengio 138 320 +131.9%
6 Lower Sarchgai Mengio 113 255 +125.7%
7 Ruru Hapa Doimukh 135 300 +122.2%
8 Jullang Borum 379 798 +110.5%
9 Kullung Mengio 258 543 +110.5%
10 Sakiang Mengio 439 920 +109.6%
11 Kharsingsa-III Doimukh 118 246 +108.5%
12 Dipu and Sudhuhapa and Dipu Forest Doimukh 100 205 +105.0%
13 Chakma - X Balijan 111 226 +103.6%
14 Mate Mengio 172 350 +103.5%
15 Sotung Mengio 144 290 +101.4%
16 Rilo RWD Colony Balijan 143 286 +100.0%
17 Hollongi Nishi Balijan 360 706 +96.1%
18 Kharsingsa-IV ( Abotani) Doimukh 128 250 +95.3%
19 Bong Mengio 184 350 +90.2%
20 Lekang Mengio 100 190 +90.0%

Villages that shrank most in Papum Pare district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Tadar Hapa Kimin 138 84 -39.1%
2 Kanebung Balijan 131 82 -37.4%
3 Nyopang - II Mengio 131 90 -31.3%
4 Tanio Pai Mengio 127 88 -30.7%
5 Yalpu Mengio 106 78 -26.4%
6 Nimte -II Sagalee 190 150 -21.1%
7 Pilla-III Mengio 151 120 -20.5%
8 Pech Sagalee 302 250 -17.2%
9 Rigo Sagalee 215 180 -16.3%
10 Dhipu Balijan 155 130 -16.1%
11 Kimin Model Village Kimin 354 300 -15.3%
12 Lower Geram Sagalee 116 100 -13.8%
13 Chakma - III Balijan 262 226 -13.7%
14 Papu - II Borum 322 280 -13.0%
15 Upper Geram Sagalee 113 100 -11.5%
16 Kheel - II Sagalee 112 100 -10.7%
17 Papu - I Borum 423 390 -7.8%
18 Depra Balijan 154 142 -7.8%
19 Pech- Hoj Sagalee 108 100 -7.4%
20 Sood Borum 285 264 -7.4%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 117 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 117 excluded in total. How the limits are set.