GaonData

Biggest population changes in Tawang district

Computed from 81 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Tawang district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Lumpo Zemithang Dudunghar 254 427 +68.1%
2 Challengdung Zemithang Dudunghar 113 186 +64.6%
3 Audung Kitpi 145 238 +64.1%
4 Kharman Zemithang Dudunghar 200 327 +63.5%
5 Sakpret Tawang 184 289 +57.1%
6 Yabab Lumla 119 186 +56.3%
7 Sanghar Zemithang Dudunghar 194 301 +55.1%
8 Khobleteng Zemithang Dudunghar 273 413 +51.3%
9 Kelengteng Zemithang Dudunghar 131 197 +50.4%
10 Gorsam Zemithang Dudunghar 103 153 +48.5%
11 Bleteng Zemithang Dudunghar 262 387 +47.7%
12 Muchut Zemithang Dudunghar 177 259 +46.3%
13 T.Gonpa Zemithang Dudunghar 204 298 +46.1%
14 Khozo Lumla 318 462 +45.3%
15 Mramey Zemithang Dudunghar 100 145 +45.0%
16 Thongleng Tawang 377 546 +44.8%
17 Dudunghar Zemithang Dudunghar 164 237 +44.5%
18 Namtsering Zemithang Dudunghar 235 337 +43.4%
19 Baghar Lumla 218 308 +41.3%
20 Khinmey Gonpa Tawang 103 145 +40.8%

Villages that shrank most in Tawang district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Bomja Mukto Bongkhar 259 161 -37.8%
2 Gyangkhar Tawang 239 150 -37.2%
3 Jamyang Choikorling Gonpa Tawang 166 107 -35.5%
4 Kyableng Tawang 370 240 -35.1%
5 Dugumba Lumla 161 110 -31.7%
6 Lhoukhar Tawang 123 85 -30.9%
7 Mandrelling Tawang 279 198 -29.0%
8 Bumteng Tawang 114 81 -28.9%
9 Grenghar Kitpi 112 80 -28.6%
10 Shobur Tawang 132 95 -28.0%
11 Grelling Tawang 258 189 -26.7%
12 Teli Tawang 173 129 -25.4%
13 Gongkhar Mukto Bongkhar 545 448 -17.8%
14 Yanla Gompa Tawang 124 106 -14.5%
15 Khrimu Kitpi 596 525 -11.9%
16 Shyo Tawang 488 436 -10.7%
17 Maidung Tawang 317 310 -2.2%
18 Lumla H.Q. Lumla 560 563 +0.5%
19 Paigong Tawang 462 467 +1.1%
20 New Lumla Lumla 565 575 +1.8%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 75 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 75 excluded in total. How the limits are set.