GaonData

Biggest population changes in Tirap district

Computed from 80 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Tirap district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Kaimai Khonsa 514 1,231 +139.5%
2 New Laptang Borduria 222 506 +127.9%
3 Laptang Borduria 173 380 +119.7%
4 Moktowa- II Dadam 559 1,190 +112.9%
5 Moktowa - I Dadam 618 1,185 +91.8%
6 Lower Chinkui Dadam 191 335 +75.4%
7 Soha Namsang 773 1,300 +68.2%
8 Noksa Khonsa 365 601 +64.7%
9 Old Paniduria Borduria 458 747 +63.1%
10 Upper Kolam Lazu 636 995 +56.5%
11 Laju H.Q. Lazu 447 657 +47.0%
12 New Phinthing Namsang 141 206 +46.1%
13 Pongkong Lazu 370 540 +46.0%
14 Old Tupi Khonsa 475 687 +44.6%
15 Borduria Borduria 1,499 2,157 +43.9%
16 Vivek Namsang 103 148 +43.7%
17 Lonyen Lazu 287 402 +40.1%
18 Laho Dadam 1,253 1,750 +39.7%
19 Old Kothung Lazu 405 560 +38.3%
20 Bera Dadam 445 611 +37.3%

Villages that shrank most in Tirap district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Old Kothin Dadam 131 111 -15.3%
2 Old Doidam Namsang 383 333 -13.1%
3 Lower Sinnu Lazu 498 475 -4.6%
4 Dadam Dadam 1,569 1,580 +0.7%
5 Jumdang Namsang 106 107 +0.9%
6 Nogna Lazu 395 399 +1.0%
7 Wathin Khonsa 242 246 +1.6%
8 Wasathong Namsang 405 414 +2.2%
9 Pansumthong Borduria 171 176 +2.9%
10 Kheti Khonsa 969 1,002 +3.4%
11 Lamlo Namsang 217 225 +3.7%
12 Old Phinthing Namsang 178 186 +4.5%
13 Narottam Nagar Namsang 864 905 +4.8%
14 Namsang Namsang 381 400 +5.0%
15 New Kothung Lazu 500 525 +5.0%
16 Sumsipathar Borduria 157 165 +5.1%
17 Namsangmukh Namsang 618 650 +5.2%
18 Longbo Khonsa 216 230 +6.5%
19 Pullong Vill. Borduria 375 400 +6.7%
20 Khela Khonsa 564 607 +7.6%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 13 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 13 excluded in total. How the limits are set.