Biggest population changes in Biswanath district
Computed from 617 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Biswanath district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bali Gaon | 249 | 620 | +149.0% |
| 2 | No.2 Daladalani | 419 | 1,041 | +148.4% |
| 3 | Sadharu T.E. F.S. 23/28 | 903 | 2,220 | +145.8% |
| 4 | Mugachang | 346 | 845 | +144.2% |
| 5 | No.1 Garoimari | 369 | 900 | +143.9% |
| 6 | Nlr 41/49 Monai Bagicha | 365 | 890 | +143.8% |
| 7 | Majuli Ghur T.E. 36/2 | 422 | 1,025 | +142.9% |
| 8 | Rangagara T.E(Bargang)53/91(2) | 389 | 944 | +142.7% |
| 9 | Jokapara | 339 | 820 | +141.9% |
| 10 | Monabari T.E. 292/495 | 946 | 2,274 | +140.4% |
| 11 | Pabhoi T.E. 35/7 | 256 | 610 | +138.3% |
| 12 | Diring T.E. 313/519 | 564 | 1,329 | +135.6% |
| 13 | Dulung Mukh | 243 | 570 | +134.6% |
| 14 | Barbil T.E. 242/415 | 516 | 1,195 | +131.6% |
| 15 | Dhali T.E. 278/475 | 369 | 846 | +129.3% |
| 16 | Garudhuwa Dubi | 319 | 731 | +129.2% |
| 17 | No.3 Barpathar | 985 | 2,210 | +124.4% |
| 18 | Mijikajan T.E. 282/485 | 538 | 1,200 | +123.0% |
| 19 | No.2 Uppar Tinsukia | 943 | 2,085 | +121.1% |
| 20 | Bihpukhuri Kachari | 249 | 542 | +117.7% |
Villages that shrank most in Biswanath district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rangpur | 453 | 275 | -39.3% |
| 2 | Kamar Gaon | 3,530 | 2,153 | -39.0% |
| 3 | No.2 Bhojmari | 939 | 575 | -38.8% |
| 4 | Garobasti | 143 | 88 | -38.5% |
| 5 | Kharani Jan | 870 | 540 | -37.9% |
| 6 | Siju Bari | 872 | 542 | -37.8% |
| 7 | Bali Dubi | 838 | 525 | -37.4% |
| 8 | Pani Bharal | 1,408 | 893 | -36.6% |
| 9 | Boka Bil | 2,440 | 1,560 | -36.1% |
| 10 | Am-Tola | 1,406 | 902 | -35.9% |
| 11 | Rangalial | 1,441 | 930 | -35.5% |
| 12 | Rajghar Lakhipur | 715 | 462 | -35.4% |
| 13 | No.1 Kamdewal | 656 | 424 | -35.4% |
| 14 | Pratap Garh 91/158 | 1,204 | 787 | -34.6% |
| 15 | Halem T.E. 270/442 Grant | 4,953 | 3,243 | -34.5% |
| 16 | No.3 Komalia | 1,826 | 1,200 | -34.3% |
| 17 | F.S. 33/3 Diplonga | 969 | 640 | -34.0% |
| 18 | Dangtala | 189 | 125 | -33.9% |
| 19 | Sakomatha F.S. 1/3 | 2,200 | 1,470 | -33.2% |
| 20 | No.1 Daladalani | 713 | 477 | -33.1% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
36 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 1 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
37 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.