Biggest population changes in Dima Hasao district
Computed from 430 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Dima Hasao district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hangrum | 398 | 974 | +144.7% |
| 2 | Loskor (Buljoul) | 109 | 251 | +130.3% |
| 3 | Laisang | 778 | 1,710 | +119.8% |
| 4 | Dorbin | 183 | 350 | +91.3% |
| 5 | Boro Larpheng | 174 | 321 | +84.5% |
| 6 | Rong Arting N | 224 | 409 | +82.6% |
| 7 | Diyung Bathari | 105 | 188 | +79.0% |
| 8 | Wasubil | 447 | 783 | +75.2% |
| 9 | Gamvom Ll | 116 | 203 | +75.0% |
| 10 | Rangapur | 151 | 261 | +72.8% |
| 11 | Hojai Kasiba | 242 | 418 | +72.7% |
| 12 | Mouchar (Mancher) | 277 | 476 | +71.8% |
| 13 | Path | 211 | 351 | +66.3% |
| 14 | Nobdi Boila | 172 | 282 | +64.0% |
| 15 | Boro Robi | 171 | 278 | +62.6% |
| 16 | AMDC | 128 | 208 | +62.5% |
| 17 | Ngente | 119 | 192 | +61.3% |
| 18 | Boro Longku | 228 | 364 | +59.6% |
| 19 | Zion | 421 | 669 | +58.9% |
| 20 | Hokai Puonchi | 210 | 332 | +58.1% |
Villages that shrank most in Dima Hasao district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Natun Path | 310 | 191 | -38.4% |
| 2 | Khepre | 694 | 435 | -37.3% |
| 3 | Chaikambao (Chaikwam) | 113 | 71 | -37.2% |
| 4 | Dihakubra Panghai | 232 | 147 | -36.6% |
| 5 | Langgaokro | 395 | 252 | -36.2% |
| 6 | Choto Neinglo (H) | 221 | 141 | -36.2% |
| 7 | Boro Langlai | 286 | 185 | -35.3% |
| 8 | Indunglo | 146 | 96 | -34.3% |
| 9 | N. Nachangjol | 159 | 105 | -34.0% |
| 10 | Tongibra | 165 | 109 | -33.9% |
| 11 | Dithur Tea Garden | 494 | 330 | -33.2% |
| 12 | Digandu V | 125 | 84 | -32.8% |
| 13 | Michidui (Michidul) | 284 | 192 | -32.4% |
| 14 | Laisong Porter Camp | 116 | 79 | -31.9% |
| 15 | Harichandpur | 1,529 | 1,084 | -29.1% |
| 16 | Rajbari | 261 | 186 | -28.7% |
| 17 | Harangajao Deswali | 1,006 | 725 | -27.9% |
| 18 | Mupa | 283 | 204 | -27.9% |
| 19 | Zoar | 304 | 220 | -27.6% |
| 20 | Didambra | 1,010 | 731 | -27.6% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
152 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
152 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.