Biggest population changes in Kamrup Metro district
Computed from 136 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Kamrup Metro district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nibira N.C. | 348 | 840 | +141.4% |
| 2 | Lomsum Pathar | 233 | 500 | +114.6% |
| 3 | Mitani Gaon | 377 | 808 | +114.3% |
| 4 | Mitani N.C. | 425 | 900 | +111.8% |
| 5 | Bhakuagog | 388 | 809 | +108.5% |
| 6 | Teteliguri N.C. | 438 | 900 | +105.5% |
| 7 | Sakurabori | 300 | 600 | +100.0% |
| 8 | Salana | 1,152 | 2,300 | +99.7% |
| 9 | Rewa Gaon | 507 | 1,000 | +97.2% |
| 10 | Maloibari N.C | 1,031 | 1,956 | +89.7% |
| 11 | Rewa N.C. | 111 | 200 | +80.2% |
| 12 | Lakhara | 265 | 468 | +76.6% |
| 13 | Gog N.C. | 199 | 350 | +75.9% |
| 14 | Moirakuchi | 974 | 1,700 | +74.5% |
| 15 | Pub-Maloibari | 1,305 | 2,270 | +74.0% |
| 16 | 2 No. Panikhati | 646 | 1,120 | +73.4% |
| 17 | Uppar Killing N.C. | 270 | 466 | +72.6% |
| 18 | No.1 Tegheria Gaon | 279 | 480 | +72.0% |
| 19 | 1 No. Dhamkhunda | 399 | 645 | +61.6% |
| 20 | Ullani | 518 | 800 | +54.4% |
Villages that shrank most in Kamrup Metro district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bonda | 4,210 | 2,550 | -39.4% |
| 2 | Thakurkuchi N.C. | 277 | 170 | -38.6% |
| 3 | Pacheniapara | 2,446 | 1,550 | -36.6% |
| 4 | Kamalajari Gaon | 2,344 | 1,500 | -36.0% |
| 5 | Sonai Gaon | 1,545 | 1,000 | -35.3% |
| 6 | Dharbam | 1,996 | 1,360 | -31.9% |
| 7 | Bandargog N.C. | 585 | 400 | -31.6% |
| 8 | 2 No.Dhamkhunda | 1,857 | 1,270 | -31.6% |
| 9 | Mikirpara Chokardoi | 2,802 | 1,926 | -31.3% |
| 10 | Thakurkuchi Gaon | 532 | 380 | -28.6% |
| 11 | 2 No. Chandrapur | 1,167 | 880 | -24.6% |
| 12 | Lofar Gaon | 311 | 244 | -21.5% |
| 13 | Kahikuchi | 2,211 | 1,747 | -21.0% |
| 14 | Talani N.C. | 510 | 420 | -17.6% |
| 15 | Ghoramarajan Pam | 1,834 | 1,512 | -17.6% |
| 16 | 2 No. Birkuchi | 898 | 742 | -17.4% |
| 17 | Jabe | 228 | 190 | -16.7% |
| 18 | Kurkuria Grant | 461 | 387 | -16.1% |
| 19 | Helagog | 3,531 | 2,980 | -15.6% |
| 20 | Lofar N.C. | 459 | 388 | -15.5% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
4 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 1 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
5 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.