Biggest population changes in Karbi Anglong district
Computed from 1,026 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Karbi Anglong district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bas Bari No.2 | 249 | 620 | +149.0% |
| 2 | Pub-Gajalipar | 258 | 625 | +142.3% |
| 3 | Bill Pathar | 163 | 394 | +141.7% |
| 4 | Neparpeti Kachari Gaon | 280 | 676 | +141.4% |
| 5 | Moukhuti Gaon | 427 | 1,025 | +140.1% |
| 6 | Patra Disa Kangki Engti | 117 | 280 | +139.3% |
| 7 | Bandhipur | 313 | 728 | +132.6% |
| 8 | Kuruna Killing | 168 | 390 | +132.1% |
| 9 | Rajapathar Tin-Ali | 251 | 577 | +129.9% |
| 10 | Uttor Phonglokpet | 537 | 1,232 | +129.4% |
| 11 | Hawang Teron | 212 | 478 | +125.5% |
| 12 | Halda Bagan (English Bagan) | 166 | 370 | +122.9% |
| 13 | Dhupguri | 159 | 354 | +122.6% |
| 14 | Baburam Rongphar | 126 | 280 | +122.2% |
| 15 | Mohiram Taro | 102 | 225 | +120.6% |
| 16 | Dhorom Ronghang | 118 | 260 | +120.3% |
| 17 | No.3 Jasiguri | 368 | 800 | +117.4% |
| 18 | Hembonglong | 198 | 430 | +117.2% |
| 19 | Bor Pukhuri | 175 | 380 | +117.1% |
| 20 | On Bey (Sardisa ) | 202 | 430 | +112.9% |
Villages that shrank most in Karbi Anglong district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Binhum Killing | 198 | 120 | -39.4% |
| 2 | Mahamaya Bal Gaon | 467 | 284 | -39.2% |
| 3 | Nagachang Jila Basti | 295 | 180 | -39.0% |
| 4 | Mon Sing Teron | 314 | 192 | -38.9% |
| 5 | Longki Teron | 188 | 117 | -37.8% |
| 6 | Dhonsiri Dimai Dili | 604 | 378 | -37.4% |
| 7 | Jar Engleng | 155 | 97 | -37.4% |
| 8 | Khongwani | 182 | 114 | -37.4% |
| 9 | Honbaka-I | 201 | 126 | -37.3% |
| 10 | Nalaso Engti gaon | 143 | 90 | -37.1% |
| 11 | Nihang Ingti Gaon | 216 | 136 | -37.0% |
| 12 | Toko Langso | 361 | 229 | -36.6% |
| 13 | Hemari Rongpi | 225 | 143 | -36.4% |
| 14 | Chinthong Tokbi | 342 | 218 | -36.3% |
| 15 | Kherbari | 453 | 289 | -36.2% |
| 16 | Udali Gaon 1,2 | 1,731 | 1,108 | -36.0% |
| 17 | Dilawjan | 903 | 578 | -36.0% |
| 18 | Narlongti Adorsha | 303 | 195 | -35.6% |
| 19 | Kha Engti | 289 | 186 | -35.6% |
| 20 | Ramsing Terang | 132 | 85 | -35.6% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
320 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 6 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
326 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.