Rupahi block
Nagaon district, Assam · 42 villages
Villages
42
Average change
+23.2%
across 37 measurable villages
Population 2011 → 2020
1,24,394 → 1,51,218
compared villages only
Villages in this block
| Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Barpaka | 3,676 | 3,500 | -4.8% |
| Barpeta | 4,618 | 4,718 | +2.2% |
| Batamari | 1,965 | 2,296 | +16.8% |
| Belaguri Kachari Gaon | 2,675 | — | unreliable |
| Borghat | 3,852 | 5,030 | +30.6% |
| Dakhin Khatowal | 5,960 | 6,117 | +2.6% |
| Dighali | 1,089 | 1,139 | +4.6% |
| Fakali | 3,667 | 2,359 | -35.7% |
| Gatanga | 1,182 | 1,397 | +18.2% |
| Gehua Chalchali | 5,562 | 7,200 | +29.4% |
| Gereki | 3,464 | 6,500 | +87.6% |
| Gerua Ati | 3,781 | 4,705 | +24.4% |
| Gorajan | 2,622 | 3,500 | +33.5% |
| Gorematikhowa | 3,941 | 5,730 | +45.4% |
| Halowa Gaon | 1,634 | 1,810 | +10.8% |
| Hathi Para (Pathipara) | 6,740 | 6,895 | +2.3% |
| Hathi Pukhuri | 4,081 | 5,930 | +45.3% |
| Jarthani (Jarkhani) | 2,282 | 2,981 | +30.6% |
| Jiewmari | 3,230 | 3,985 | +23.4% |
| Kanchanpur | 3,688 | — | unreliable |
| Kandhuli Mari | 1,481 | 2,756 | +86.1% |
| Khanatup | 1,259 | 1,150 | -8.7% |
| Koach Gaon | 1,765 | 1,577 | -10.7% |
| Kumar Gaon | 3,628 | 6,500 | +79.2% |
| Laogaon | 4,205 | 5,082 | +20.9% |
| Latabowa | 957 | 1,757 | +83.6% |
| Nanal Dowa | 4,631 | — | unreliable |
| Niz Saidaria | 3,206 | 2,783 | -13.2% |
| Owana | 2,641 | 2,786 | +5.5% |
| Pachim Amrakanda | 2,337 | 2,804 | +20.0% |
| Pachim Photaljar | 3,423 | 5,480 | +60.1% |
| Pub-Amrakanda | 3,221 | 3,865 | +20.0% |
| Pub-Photaljar | 6,571 | 8,100 | +23.3% |
| Puthikhaity | 3,844 | 4,085 | +6.3% |
| Rawmari | 4,237 | 4,939 | +16.6% |
| Rupahi Bhakat Gaon | 2,007 | — | unreliable |
| Rupahi Town (CT) | — | — | — |
| Sapat Kara | 2,403 | 2,994 | +24.6% |
| Tamalitup | 1,764 | 2,465 | +39.7% |
| Telia Chapori Toop | 2,523 | 2,787 | +10.5% |
| Telia Sapari | 3,639 | 3,866 | +6.2% |
| Uttar Khatowal | 7,944 | 9,650 | +21.5% |
Blocks are the administrative tier between district and village. The block a village belongs to comes from the Local Government Directory via the 2020 survey, so it reflects boundaries as of 2020, not 2011.