Biggest population changes in South Salmara Mancachar district
Computed from 135 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in South Salmara Mancachar district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Baushkata Pt.V | 577 | 1,350 | +134.0% |
| 2 | Kanyamati (Kamamoti ) | 539 | 1,230 | +128.2% |
| 3 | Khodaidhila | 1,936 | 4,337 | +124.0% |
| 4 | Saboltari | 2,314 | 5,099 | +120.3% |
| 5 | Baushkata Pt.I | 585 | 1,275 | +118.0% |
| 6 | Kanaimara Pt.I | 1,904 | 4,000 | +110.1% |
| 7 | Moishaldanga Pt.II | 762 | 1,600 | +110.0% |
| 8 | Pata Kata | 3,888 | 7,974 | +105.1% |
| 9 | Monirchar | 707 | 1,420 | +100.8% |
| 10 | Char Bastir Char | 493 | 990 | +100.8% |
| 11 | Jogipara | 652 | 1,250 | +91.7% |
| 12 | Berabanga Pt.II | 3,317 | 6,200 | +86.9% |
| 13 | Fulerchar Pt.IV | 4,086 | 7,447 | +82.3% |
| 14 | Berabanga Pt.I | 1,476 | 2,680 | +81.6% |
| 15 | Dayerchar | 1,758 | 3,132 | +78.2% |
| 16 | Ferengichar | 3,865 | 6,846 | +77.1% |
| 17 | Charia Gram | 635 | 1,120 | +76.4% |
| 18 | Gotabari | 2,643 | 4,660 | +76.3% |
| 19 | Boalea Pt.I | 1,101 | 1,918 | +74.2% |
| 20 | Bormatia | 742 | 1,276 | +72.0% |
Villages that shrank most in South Salmara Mancachar district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Baladmara (Fakirganga) | 5,885 | 3,872 | -34.2% |
| 2 | Kaliralga Pt.II | 1,441 | 1,050 | -27.1% |
| 3 | Pathuria | 8,466 | 6,353 | -25.0% |
| 4 | Barkona | 3,084 | 2,363 | -23.4% |
| 5 | Fekamari Pt.I | 3,565 | 2,860 | -19.8% |
| 6 | Margaon Jatna | 2,049 | 1,810 | -11.7% |
| 7 | Borokalia Goladegi | 5,434 | 4,820 | -11.3% |
| 8 | Dewaneralga Pt.I | 1,466 | 1,330 | -9.3% |
| 9 | Kakripara Pt.II | 4,668 | 4,421 | -5.3% |
| 10 | Pipulbari Pt.IV | 3,688 | 3,620 | -1.8% |
| 11 | Fattapara | 3,309 | 3,330 | +0.6% |
| 12 | Shadullabari | 4,584 | 4,825 | +5.3% |
| 13 | Thakurarbari | 8,976 | 9,632 | +7.3% |
| 14 | Bhimapara | 5,189 | 5,660 | +9.1% |
| 15 | Jordanga Pt.I | 5,117 | 5,654 | +10.5% |
| 16 | Pipulbari Pt.II | 3,315 | 3,700 | +11.6% |
| 17 | Dhapgurikuraltanga Pt.II | 1,613 | 1,836 | +13.8% |
| 18 | Sunderpara Pt.IV | 6,969 | 7,975 | +14.4% |
| 19 | Depkaidalbari | 1,605 | 1,840 | +14.6% |
| 20 | Charbari Pt.II | 979 | 1,140 | +16.4% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
4 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
4 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.