Biggest population changes in Tinsukia district
Computed from 916 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Tinsukia district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bisa Gaon No.2 | 529 | 1,300 | +145.8% |
| 2 | Gakhir Bheti Gaon | 823 | 2,010 | +144.2% |
| 3 | Ratani Pathar | 421 | 1,011 | +140.1% |
| 4 | Nabajyoti | 627 | 1,500 | +139.2% |
| 5 | Bishnupur N.C. No.1 | 643 | 1,535 | +138.7% |
| 6 | Dangari Gaon | 553 | 1,320 | +138.7% |
| 7 | Borgolai Telkhat | 503 | 1,200 | +138.6% |
| 8 | Kakapathar No-1 | 939 | 2,235 | +138.0% |
| 9 | Bebejia N.C. | 287 | 675 | +135.2% |
| 10 | 1 No.Santipur | 306 | 717 | +134.3% |
| 11 | Kula Pathar No.1 | 117 | 274 | +134.2% |
| 12 | Tara T.E. Wl. No-37 | 350 | 813 | +132.3% |
| 13 | Abor Gaon N.C. | 524 | 1,210 | +130.9% |
| 14 | Mancha Pathar | 293 | 674 | +130.0% |
| 15 | Tirap Mukh | 122 | 280 | +129.5% |
| 16 | Tongana T.E. No-22 Wla. | 621 | 1,403 | +125.9% |
| 17 | Inthong | 136 | 305 | +124.3% |
| 18 | Lakla Pathar N.C. | 1,394 | 3,104 | +122.7% |
| 19 | Borbheta Kuhiyar Bari | 344 | 765 | +122.4% |
| 20 | Rajkhowa Pathar | 190 | 420 | +121.0% |
Villages that shrank most in Tinsukia district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Miri Chapori | 237 | 146 | -38.4% |
| 2 | Baghjan T.E. 137/140 (A) Nlr | 790 | 489 | -38.1% |
| 3 | Bordubi T.E. 172/169 Nlr. | 2,995 | 1,880 | -37.2% |
| 4 | Deopani Chapori | 406 | 255 | -37.2% |
| 5 | Parbotipur Gaon | 1,331 | 839 | -37.0% |
| 6 | Takajan gaon (Tokajan Deori) | 1,435 | 910 | -36.6% |
| 7 | 1 No.Kundil | 226 | 146 | -35.4% |
| 8 | Kehang Te. 5/18 no.Darkhast | 1,204 | 780 | -35.2% |
| 9 | Dazijan No.1 | 1,019 | 667 | -34.5% |
| 10 | Khatangpani Gaon | 1,484 | 987 | -33.5% |
| 11 | No-1Balupara Gaon | 1,428 | 950 | -33.5% |
| 12 | Ahom Gaon | 1,115 | 750 | -32.7% |
| 13 | Tekeri Gaon Block No.1 | 1,667 | 1,130 | -32.2% |
| 14 | Nam Hollong Nagaon | 714 | 490 | -31.4% |
| 15 | Simoluguri Chuck | 656 | 458 | -30.2% |
| 16 | Talap Gaon | 1,010 | 709 | -29.8% |
| 17 | Kachijan No-1 | 1,941 | 1,365 | -29.7% |
| 18 | Hastinapur | 209 | 148 | -29.2% |
| 19 | Sonaligaon | 175 | 124 | -29.1% |
| 20 | Kajanga Gaon | 867 | 617 | -28.8% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
23 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 2 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
25 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.