Biggest population changes in Bihar
Computed from 34,082 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Bihar
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Baghmara Milik | 481 | 1,200 | +149.5% |
| 2 | Dewa Chak | 481 | 1,200 | +149.5% |
| 3 | Diara Maranchi Urf Kasaha | 3,636 | 9,070 | +149.4% |
| 4 | Telganwan | 168 | 419 | +149.4% |
| 5 | Kalan Dhanawan | 308 | 768 | +149.3% |
| 6 | Tola Jamhara | 321 | 800 | +149.2% |
| 7 | Bharthipatti | 191 | 476 | +149.2% |
| 8 | Piprahia | 5,428 | 13,525 | +149.2% |
| 9 | Haseli Milik | 261 | 650 | +149.0% |
| 10 | Tola Suia | 2,570 | 6,400 | +149.0% |
| 11 | Madhpur | 251 | 625 | +149.0% |
| 12 | Tola Pesarha | 188 | 468 | +148.9% |
| 13 | Rakba Arari Belsandi | 221 | 550 | +148.9% |
| 14 | Kathwan | 221 | 550 | +148.9% |
| 15 | Gauharpur | 402 | 1,000 | +148.8% |
| 16 | Mathia | 887 | 2,205 | +148.6% |
| 17 | Navhi | 3,223 | 8,000 | +148.2% |
| 18 | Hafania | 403 | 1,000 | +148.1% |
| 19 | Dosti Mahamadpur | 3,872 | 9,602 | +148.0% |
| 20 | Bardiha | 398 | 987 | +148.0% |
Villages that shrank most in Bihar
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Darmahi | 2,429 | 1,471 | -39.4% |
| 2 | Baruraj | 27,064 | 16,398 | -39.4% |
| 3 | Nawa Chak | 1,386 | 840 | -39.4% |
| 4 | Majhauli | 825 | 500 | -39.4% |
| 5 | Kamrauli Jangali | 5,605 | 3,401 | -39.3% |
| 6 | Barka Nimdihra | 1,238 | 752 | -39.3% |
| 7 | Nimchak | 586 | 356 | -39.3% |
| 8 | Kabirpur | 1,784 | 1,084 | -39.2% |
| 9 | Tola Basbutti | 908 | 552 | -39.2% |
| 10 | Mahamda | 3,016 | 1,834 | -39.2% |
| 11 | Barsauna | 5,343 | 3,250 | -39.2% |
| 12 | Baksara | 2,255 | 1,372 | -39.2% |
| 13 | Pariharpur | 4,720 | 2,879 | -39.0% |
| 14 | Chhatauna | 3,848 | 2,350 | -38.9% |
| 15 | Mangarh | 6,534 | 4,000 | -38.8% |
| 16 | Khutahri | 2,329 | 1,426 | -38.8% |
| 17 | Khiridih | 2,178 | 1,334 | -38.8% |
| 18 | Khalilpur | 1,890 | 1,158 | -38.7% |
| 19 | Rani | 693 | 425 | -38.7% |
| 20 | Chakauti | 8,962 | 5,500 | -38.6% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
678 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 23 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
701 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.