GaonData

Biggest population changes in Kaimur (Bhabua) district

Computed from 1,135 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Kaimur (Bhabua) district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Bheri Chand 771 1,900 +146.4%
2 Pachilakhi Durgawati 1,664 3,960 +138.0%
3 Manoharpur Durgawati 522 1,230 +135.6%
4 Dugauli Chand 777 1,750 +125.2%
5 LahoPakar Chand 222 500 +125.2%
6 Uprauli Ramgarh 943 2,100 +122.7%
7 Tola Gopinathpur Durgawati 270 600 +122.2%
8 Gosaisipur Durgawati 523 1,155 +120.8%
9 Balpur Ramgarh 303 658 +117.2%
10 Toroiya Ramgarh 1,095 2,300 +110.0%
11 Rampur Chand 366 750 +104.9%
12 Dusaunti Durgawati 926 1,880 +103.0%
13 Darauli Durgawati 1,232 2,500 +102.9%
14 Horilpur Mohania 150 300 +100.0%
15 Uphraurlia Bhabua 344 675 +96.2%
16 Bamhaur Panre Mohania 1,407 2,700 +91.9%
17 Jagdishpur Chand 339 635 +87.3%
18 Ruhiya Nuaon 470 880 +87.2%
19 Kathej Mohania 4,471 8,256 +84.7%
20 Dharwar Bhabua 412 758 +84.0%

Villages that shrank most in Kaimur (Bhabua) district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Barka Nimdihra Kudra 1,238 752 -39.3%
2 Naughara Chainpur 2,346 1,578 -32.7%
3 Chaubepur Nuaon 733 496 -32.3%
4 Parhauti Bhagwanpur 2,214 1,500 -32.3%
5 Shiv Chand 1,668 1,154 -30.8%
6 Sarai Mohania 1,004 700 -30.3%
7 Chanrudean Rampur 156 110 -29.5%
8 Gogarhi Ramgarh 918 660 -28.1%
9 Hariharpur Bhabua 1,506 1,086 -27.9%
10 Karigawan Mohania 1,082 800 -26.1%
11 Patesar Chand 2,242 1,680 -25.1%
12 Dalippur Bhabua 352 265 -24.7%
13 Nibi Khurd Bhabua 485 371 -23.5%
14 Bishunpura Ramgarh 386 308 -20.2%
15 Mera Ramgarh 612 490 -19.9%
16 Masarhi Ramgarh 3,207 2,750 -14.3%
17 Sarewa Bhabua 1,661 1,430 -13.9%
18 Jigni Bhabua 2,747 2,391 -13.0%
19 Parasia Bhabua 979 880 -10.1%
20 Harnathpur Mohania 698 630 -9.7%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 56 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 56 excluded in total. How the limits are set.