Biggest population changes in Sheohar district
Computed from 149 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Sheohar district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dosti Mahamadpur | 3,872 | 9,602 | +148.0% |
| 2 | Bhorha Mohanpur | 3,185 | 6,370 | +100.0% |
| 3 | Ghorha | 1,864 | 3,220 | +72.8% |
| 4 | Kishunpur Narwara | 286 | 490 | +71.3% |
| 5 | Arazi Rakbe Narwara | 519 | 885 | +70.5% |
| 6 | Kishunpur urf Narwara | 10,581 | 17,988 | +70.0% |
| 7 | Harkarwa | 2,127 | 3,401 | +59.9% |
| 8 | Nandna | 387 | 612 | +58.1% |
| 9 | Bhaluahi | 1,176 | 1,776 | +51.0% |
| 10 | Umed Chhapra | 1,416 | 2,107 | +48.8% |
| 11 | Chhapra Jurawan | 1,327 | 1,902 | +43.3% |
| 12 | Bindraban | 9,145 | 12,873 | +40.8% |
| 13 | Sirsian | 229 | 320 | +39.7% |
| 14 | Kataiya | 2,132 | 2,913 | +36.6% |
| 15 | Chak Surgahi | 2,941 | 4,008 | +36.3% |
| 16 | Bhandiha | 611 | 826 | +35.2% |
| 17 | Samhuti | 3,279 | 4,285 | +30.7% |
| 18 | Kothia | 468 | 604 | +29.1% |
| 19 | Tajpur | 3,343 | 4,284 | +28.1% |
| 20 | Surgahi | 4,151 | 5,238 | +26.2% |
Villages that shrank most in Sheohar district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kamrauli Jangali | 5,605 | 3,401 | -39.3% |
| 2 | Fatehpur Ghaus | 1,224 | 1,090 | -10.9% |
| 3 | Sonbarsa | 5,332 | 4,950 | -7.2% |
| 4 | Parsauni Taiyab | 1,577 | 1,545 | -2.0% |
| 5 | Sugia Katesri Jagir | 2,560 | 2,523 | -1.4% |
| 6 | Sugia Karesri | 9,855 | 9,770 | -0.9% |
| 7 | Sisaula | 3,712 | 3,688 | -0.7% |
| 8 | Bishunpur Kishundeo | 2,434 | 2,449 | +0.6% |
| 9 | Kothia Dharampur Dharamaghat | 1,897 | 1,910 | +0.7% |
| 10 | Azrakbe Pota | 616 | 622 | +1.0% |
| 11 | Mahuaria | 1,955 | 1,983 | +1.4% |
| 12 | Kishunpur Narwara TolaRamnagar | 1,399 | 1,420 | +1.5% |
| 13 | Masha | 698 | 711 | +1.9% |
| 14 | Bariarpur | 1,705 | 1,739 | +2.0% |
| 15 | Chiknauta | 2,424 | 2,473 | +2.0% |
| 16 | Bhagwanpur Bheli | 776 | 793 | +2.2% |
| 17 | Bochhan urf Az Rakbe Pojhian | 292 | 300 | +2.7% |
| 18 | Jafarpur urf Sharifnagar | 1,399 | 1,440 | +2.9% |
| 19 | Baijnathpur | 1,768 | 1,825 | +3.2% |
| 20 | Salempur | 5,330 | 5,508 | +3.3% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
1 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
1 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.