GaonData

Biggest population changes in Bemetara district

Computed from 643 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Bemetara district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Bhanora Saja 1,092 2,700 +147.3%
2 Darri Nawagarh 108 265 +145.4%
3 Baijalpur Nawagarh 131 300 +129.0%
4 Khamhariya Berla 892 1,947 +118.3%
5 Dawanadih Nawagarh 380 825 +117.1%
6 Mohtara Bemetara 1,142 2,445 +114.1%
7 Murta Nawagarh 3,526 7,545 +114.0%
8 Keshla Nawagarh 893 1,784 +99.8%
9 Singhanpuri Bemetara 781 1,500 +92.1%
10 Paunsari Nawagarh 830 1,526 +83.9%
11 Chotmarra Berla 550 1,000 +81.8%
12 Garra Saja 967 1,750 +81.0%
13 Nawagaon Nawagarh 585 1,050 +79.5%
14 Ghatholi Bemetara 294 521 +77.2%
15 Jhal Nawagarh 2,799 4,800 +71.5%
16 Khamhi Nawagarh 938 1,600 +70.6%
17 Katai Nawagarh 1,767 3,000 +69.8%
18 Karesara Saja 1,629 2,750 +68.8%
19 Karchuwa Bemetara 2,079 3,500 +68.3%
20 Jiya Bemetara 1,811 3,020 +66.8%

Villages that shrank most in Bemetara district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Mohtara Bemetara 2,228 1,442 -35.3%
2 Karamsen Nawagarh 1,400 1,070 -23.6%
3 Kajra Saja 235 200 -14.9%
4 Bagaud Bemetara 770 673 -12.6%
5 Bharchatti Berla 1,144 1,000 -12.6%
6 Kunwa Nawagarh 1,100 1,000 -9.1%
7 Ghatiyakalan Berla 1,011 930 -8.0%
8 Botka Saja 273 260 -4.8%
9 Kurda Saja 614 590 -3.9%
10 Binaika Nawagarh 1,138 1,100 -3.3%
11 Jeora Nawagarh 915 885 -3.3%
12 Khamhariya Berla 1,488 1,450 -2.5%
13 Tabalghor Berla 744 735 -1.2%
14 Hatranka Saja 1,069 1,057 -1.1%
15 Budera Saja 699 695 -0.6%
16 Kamkawada Saja 678 677 -0.1%
17 Gudheli Berla 3,129 3,125 -0.1%
18 Jata Saja 1,039 1,038 -0.1%
19 Nandal Nawagarh 1,626 1,625 -0.1%
20 Chechanmeta Saja 979 980 +0.1%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 4 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 4 excluded in total. How the limits are set.