GaonData

Biggest population changes in Bilaspur district

Computed from 606 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Bilaspur district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Bahatara Masturi 1,502 3,700 +146.3%
2 Matiya Masturi 1,451 3,500 +141.2%
3 Gataura Masturi 7,070 16,790 +137.5%
4 Karra Masturi 934 2,196 +135.1%
5 Pondi Kota 1,154 2,700 +134.0%
6 Nagchuwa Kota 682 1,586 +132.6%
7 Kekti Takhatpur 1,425 3,303 +131.8%
8 Basantpur Masturi 1,048 2,415 +130.4%
9 Udaiband Masturi 676 1,545 +128.6%
10 Basha Belha 2,204 5,000 +126.9%
11 Kusmuli Kota 1,591 3,600 +126.3%
12 Khapri Belha 697 1,575 +126.0%
13 Kosamdhi Masturi 1,425 3,200 +124.6%
14 Amaldiha Masturi 996 2,220 +122.9%
15 Makundpur Masturi 863 1,915 +121.9%
16 Khudiyadih Takhatpur 338 750 +121.9%
17 Semradih Masturi 518 1,135 +119.1%
18 Nawagaon Masturi 1,357 2,968 +118.7%
19 Mohanbhatha Takhatpur 796 1,740 +118.6%
20 Pataidih Masturi 1,190 2,600 +118.5%

Villages that shrank most in Bilaspur district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Khapari Masturi 1,119 722 -35.5%
2 Ghoghara Takhatpur 807 580 -28.1%
3 Ourapani Kota 212 169 -20.3%
4 Billiband Kota 1,561 1,260 -19.3%
5 Karwa Kota 2,423 1,972 -18.6%
6 Newari Bahra Kota 694 640 -7.8%
7 Bhurkunda Masturi 1,377 1,273 -7.5%
8 Sargond Kota 431 403 -6.5%
9 Kathmunda Ryt Takhatpur 116 111 -4.3%
10 Nargoda Masturi 3,204 3,104 -3.1%
11 Kenadand Kota 999 975 -2.4%
12 Karra Kota 2,172 2,136 -1.7%
13 Pendarwa Belha 1,263 1,245 -1.4%
14 Upka Kota 887 875 -1.4%
15 Deokirari Belha 1,558 1,538 -1.3%
16 Nawagaon Kota 4,872 4,848 -0.5%
17 Majhgaon Kota 1,994 1,985 -0.5%
18 Semartal Belha 3,770 3,775 +0.1%
19 Nirtoo Takhatpur 4,457 4,480 +0.5%
20 Juhli Masturi 1,579 1,590 +0.7%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 3 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 1 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 4 excluded in total. How the limits are set.