GaonData

Biggest population changes in Durg district

Computed from 319 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Durg district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Khola Patan 824 1,966 +138.6%
2 Bharar Patan 1,950 4,106 +110.6%
3 Dumardih (Part) Durg 2,328 4,800 +106.2%
4 Gadaghat Dhamdha 641 1,060 +65.4%
5 Borway Patan 1,249 2,061 +65.0%
6 Amti Durg 817 1,347 +64.9%
7 Demar Patan 1,493 2,405 +61.1%
8 Punaidih Patan 322 489 +51.9%
9 Kanharpuri Jatagharra Dhamdha 1,207 1,827 +51.4%
10 Soram Patan 1,424 2,136 +50.0%
11 Birebhat Dhamdha 313 466 +48.9%
12 Mahka Khurd Patan 947 1,402 +48.0%
13 Dhaur Dhamdha 688 1,001 +45.5%
14 Mudpar (Dhuma) Dhamdha 562 810 +44.1%
15 Ghughsidih Durg 1,950 2,798 +43.5%
16 Malpuri Khurd Dhamdha 810 1,158 +43.0%
17 Kokdi Durg 1,338 1,905 +42.4%
18 Amalori Patan 901 1,273 +41.3%
19 Karanja Bhilai Durg 3,881 5,465 +40.8%
20 Godhiyari Patan 888 1,245 +40.2%

Villages that shrank most in Durg district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Piperchhedi Durg 1,874 1,235 -34.1%
2 Khapri Patan 379 265 -30.1%
3 Mahka Kalan Patan 994 837 -15.8%
4 Dhaur Dhamdha 900 766 -14.9%
5 Khudmudi Patan 2,073 1,850 -10.8%
6 Ghasra Dhamdha 420 390 -7.1%
7 Nikum Durg 4,764 4,539 -4.7%
8 Medesara Dhamdha 3,396 3,251 -4.3%
9 Odaragahan Patan 1,382 1,350 -2.3%
10 Kandarka Dhamdha 1,995 1,950 -2.3%
11 Jeora Durg 3,793 3,739 -1.4%
12 Kuruddih Patan 510 505 -1.0%
13 Bhendsar Durg 3,127 3,100 -0.9%
14 Ganiyari Durg 2,354 2,350 -0.2%
15 Khapri Dhamdha 1,609 1,611 +0.1%
16 Pisegaon Durg 2,293 2,296 +0.1%
17 Mudpar Patan 1,038 1,040 +0.2%
18 Parewadih Patan 446 447 +0.2%
19 Sankra Dhamdha 1,781 1,787 +0.3%
20 Godhi Dhamdha 2,494 2,512 +0.7%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 0 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 0 excluded in total. How the limits are set.