Biggest population changes in Kabirdham district
Computed from 675 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Kabirdham district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Barghat | 104 | 257 | +147.1% |
| 2 | Bhedagarh | 822 | 1,710 | +108.0% |
| 3 | Nihalpur | 470 | 950 | +102.1% |
| 4 | Majgaon | 529 | 1,050 | +98.5% |
| 5 | Dullapur | 327 | 611 | +86.8% |
| 6 | Chhirpani | 2,045 | 3,712 | +81.5% |
| 7 | Umariya | 164 | 296 | +80.5% |
| 8 | Prankapa | 539 | 944 | +75.1% |
| 9 | Bhagatpur | 316 | 552 | +74.7% |
| 10 | Akhra | 695 | 1,200 | +72.7% |
| 11 | Bharewa Puran | 746 | 1,264 | +69.4% |
| 12 | Dullapur | 512 | 861 | +68.2% |
| 13 | Mohtara Khurd | 1,112 | 1,840 | +65.5% |
| 14 | Jhingra Dongri | 769 | 1,270 | +65.2% |
| 15 | Dargawan | 382 | 630 | +64.9% |
| 16 | Kusum Ghata | 1,863 | 3,050 | +63.7% |
| 17 | Samnapur | 1,480 | 2,378 | +60.7% |
| 18 | Nawagaon Hatha | 1,508 | 2,418 | +60.3% |
| 19 | Khairbana | 302 | 480 | +58.9% |
| 20 | Lakhanpur Kalan | 2,235 | 3,550 | +58.8% |
Villages that shrank most in Kabirdham district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kukdur | 1,585 | 972 | -38.7% |
| 2 | Rabda | 180 | 115 | -36.1% |
| 3 | Lalpur Khurd | 621 | 405 | -34.8% |
| 4 | Majgaon | 960 | 627 | -34.7% |
| 5 | Lokhan | 750 | 497 | -33.7% |
| 6 | Khamhariya | 807 | 539 | -33.2% |
| 7 | Chuchrungpur | 410 | 290 | -29.3% |
| 8 | Bamhani | 2,944 | 2,100 | -28.7% |
| 9 | Bandukkunda Alias Silyari | 175 | 130 | -25.7% |
| 10 | Badaura | 340 | 280 | -17.6% |
| 11 | Khariya | 846 | 702 | -17.0% |
| 12 | Padakipara | 150 | 126 | -16.0% |
| 13 | Nawagaon | 695 | 593 | -14.7% |
| 14 | Kadkada | 518 | 453 | -12.6% |
| 15 | Dhorli | 670 | 604 | -9.8% |
| 16 | Kohari | 196 | 177 | -9.7% |
| 17 | Singhra Para | 228 | 209 | -8.3% |
| 18 | Tatikasa | 842 | 785 | -6.8% |
| 19 | Chhanta | 553 | 522 | -5.6% |
| 20 | Chhantajha | 1,605 | 1,520 | -5.3% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
25 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 1 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
26 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.