GaonData

Biggest population changes in Kanker district

Computed from 767 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Kanker district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Deepnagar Koilebeda 267 635 +137.8%
2 Kandadi Koilebeda 309 685 +121.7%
3 Alawarkalan Bhanupratappur 208 446 +114.4%
4 Musarghat Koilebeda 119 253 +112.6%
5 Karmari Antagarh 161 331 +105.6%
6 Chemal Durgukondal 665 1,353 +103.5%
7 Bango Ghodiya Koilebeda 208 418 +101.0%
8 Bande Koilebeda 381 730 +91.6%
9 Markachua Koilebeda 163 310 +90.2%
10 Karap Narharpur 1,089 1,947 +78.8%
11 Haridaspur Koilebeda 563 990 +75.8%
12 Hitoolbad Koilebeda 109 191 +75.2%
13 Gudphel Durgukondal 232 406 +75.0%
14 Kanakpur Bhanupratappur 217 357 +64.5%
15 Chhotejharkatta Koilebeda 301 495 +64.5%
16 Udumgaon Koilebeda 366 595 +62.6%
17 Bagwahi Bhanupratappur 129 203 +57.4%
18 Mardel Bhanupratappur 426 666 +56.3%
19 Rampur Koilebeda 224 350 +56.3%
20 Chaurgaon Durgukondal 656 1,020 +55.5%

Villages that shrank most in Kanker district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Sohgaon Koilebeda 484 300 -38.0%
2 Amabeda Antagarh 1,460 920 -37.0%
3 Aalparas Koilebeda 559 370 -33.8%
4 Berkot Koilebeda 317 238 -24.9%
5 Aarra Antagarh 447 338 -24.4%
6 Sonjhariyapara Durgukondal 100 76 -24.0%
7 Ghotulbeda Antagarh 310 239 -22.9%
8 Siksod Koilebeda 550 433 -21.3%
9 Chawadi Charama 670 531 -20.8%
10 Kaleparas Antagarh 534 450 -15.7%
11 Murdonda Koilebeda 426 360 -15.5%
12 Hatadkasa Koilebeda 233 201 -13.7%
13 Ukari Charama 799 692 -13.4%
14 Amakada Antagarh 332 290 -12.7%
15 Dhorkatta Koilebeda 375 329 -12.3%
16 Muramer Antagarh 298 262 -12.1%
17 Padgal Durgukondal 126 111 -11.9%
18 Kodapakha Durgukondal 703 624 -11.2%
19 Baikunthpur Koilebeda 1,969 1,750 -11.1%
20 Kanagaon Antagarh 855 765 -10.5%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 40 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 40 excluded in total. How the limits are set.