GaonData

Biggest population changes in Mungeli district

Computed from 617 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Mungeli district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Putpura Pathariya 194 460 +137.1%
2 Hardi Pathariya 451 1,052 +133.3%
3 Daukapa Lormi 1,613 3,760 +133.1%
4 Israkapa Pathariya 116 260 +124.1%
5 Bharra Kunda Mungeli 224 500 +123.2%
6 Harna Chaka Lormi 1,349 3,000 +122.4%
7 Motimpur Pathariya 538 1,190 +121.2%
8 Karupan Alias Bampara Mungeli 702 1,550 +120.8%
9 Lalsaikapa Lormi 530 1,150 +117.0%
10 Khamharia Mungeli 1,570 3,300 +110.2%
11 Laikdum Mungeli 344 720 +109.3%
12 Senguda Lormi 1,157 2,410 +108.3%
13 Gadapara Lormi 237 490 +106.8%
14 Bodhipara Mungeli 435 890 +104.6%
15 Kamta Mungeli 150 303 +102.0%
16 Bhusandi Mungeli 756 1,500 +98.4%
17 Lachhanpur Mungeli 916 1,780 +94.3%
18 Jaitpuri Mungeli 276 530 +92.0%
19 Bhulankapa Pathariya 792 1,518 +91.7%
20 Binjhori Mungeli 436 820 +88.1%

Villages that shrank most in Mungeli district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Motimpur Pathariya 1,060 735 -30.7%
2 Chhindbhog Pathariya 1,715 1,234 -28.1%
3 Daganiya Lormi 938 695 -25.9%
4 Newaspur Mungeli 1,253 970 -22.6%
5 Pardeshikapa Lormi 822 675 -17.9%
6 Jalli Mungeli 965 795 -17.6%
7 Bicharpur Mungeli 1,443 1,236 -14.3%
8 Bijarakachhar Lormi 979 850 -13.2%
9 Solhabelha Mungeli 492 450 -8.5%
10 Chilphi Lormi 993 909 -8.5%
11 Deori Mungeli 1,188 1,105 -7.0%
12 Bijrakapa Lormi 669 624 -6.7%
13 Lapti Lormi 1,901 1,800 -5.3%
14 Kewtadih Pathariya 789 754 -4.4%
15 Nawagaon Dayali Lormi 1,608 1,569 -2.4%
16 Sonpuri Mungeli 468 458 -2.1%
17 Tribhubanpur Pathariya 722 712 -1.4%
18 Barbaspur Lormi 668 663 -0.8%
19 Bindawal Lormi 886 887 +0.1%
20 Limha Mungeli 1,303 1,305 +0.1%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 16 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 16 excluded in total. How the limits are set.