GaonData

Biggest population changes in Sukma district

Computed from 285 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Sukma district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Chinnabodkel Konta 162 400 +146.9%
2 Murliguda Konta 164 400 +143.9%
3 Timmapuram Konta 209 500 +139.2%
4 Burklanka Konta 247 590 +138.9%
5 Bater Konta 137 312 +127.7%
6 Tetemadgu Konta 433 902 +108.3%
7 Karigudam Konta 351 718 +104.6%
8 Bedre Konta 155 315 +103.2%
9 Gangler Konta 156 316 +102.6%
10 Gondpalli (Mandi Marka) Konta 403 800 +98.5%
11 Jonaguda Konta 204 400 +96.1%
12 Sonakuknar Sukma 1,444 2,831 +96.0%
13 Gumodi Konta 262 500 +90.8%
14 Virapuram Konta 246 463 +88.2%
15 Dhobanpal Chhindgarh 910 1,700 +86.8%
16 Jagargunda Konta 898 1,676 +86.6%
17 Mandimarka Konta 430 800 +86.0%
18 Bainpalli Konta 255 470 +84.3%
19 Durandarbha Konta 291 510 +75.3%
20 Kanhaiguda (Nelmeta) Konta 104 180 +73.1%

Villages that shrank most in Sukma district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Jagawaram Konta 387 235 -39.3%
2 Kanhaiguda Konta 159 100 -37.1%
3 Golapalli Konta 175 113 -35.4%
4 Duled Konta 1,029 665 -35.4%
5 Tarlaguda Konta 203 132 -35.0%
6 Lendra Konta 713 498 -30.1%
7 Puswada Konta 407 300 -26.3%
8 Singa Ram Konta 270 200 -25.9%
9 Tolnai Konta 228 170 -25.4%
10 Ramaram Konta 567 427 -24.7%
11 Murki Sukma 382 295 -22.8%
12 Pesalpad Konta 154 120 -22.1%
13 Junapani Chhindgarh 458 367 -19.9%
14 Ursangal Konta 561 450 -19.8%
15 Bhandarpadar Konta 488 395 -19.1%
16 Kodripal Chhindgarh 1,210 1,004 -17.0%
17 Dhondra Konta 1,760 1,465 -16.8%
18 Dharmakonta Konta 131 110 -16.0%
19 Bodumpad Konta 119 100 -16.0%
20 Mukram Konta 708 599 -15.4%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 16 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 16 excluded in total. How the limits are set.