GaonData

Biggest population changes in South Goa district

Computed from 107 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in South Goa district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Adsulim Salcete 214 504 +135.5%
2 Bendordem Quepem 609 1,275 +109.4%
3 Conxem Ponda 186 386 +107.5%
4 Paroda Salcete 620 1,225 +97.6%
5 Padi Quepem 268 505 +88.4%
6 Duncolim Salcete 748 1,330 +77.8%
7 Orlim Salcete 2,049 3,600 +75.7%
8 Nirancal Ponda 1,772 3,099 +74.9%
9 Candepar Ponda 3,768 6,500 +72.5%
10 Bali Quepem 2,944 4,890 +66.1%
11 Loliem Canacona 4,797 7,930 +65.3%
12 Issorcim Mormugao 841 1,356 +61.2%
13 Comproi Sanguem 620 986 +59.0%
14 Pale Mormugao 1,990 3,140 +57.8%
15 Codar Ponda 733 1,150 +56.9%
16 Colva Salcete 3,141 4,902 +56.1%
17 Betalbatim Salcete 3,551 5,450 +53.5%
18 Mulem Salcete 2,799 4,275 +52.7%
19 Cormonem Dharbandora 645 958 +48.5%
20 Cana Salcete 494 726 +47.0%

Villages that shrank most in South Goa district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Adcolna Ponda 1,688 1,289 -23.6%
2 Gandaulim Salcete 438 340 -22.4%
3 Santona Sanguem 1,403 1,194 -14.9%
4 Naiquinim Sanguem 252 215 -14.7%
5 Boma Ponda 2,807 2,426 -13.6%
6 Cuncoliem Ponda 1,385 1,215 -12.3%
7 Siroda Ponda 14,041 12,958 -7.7%
8 Adnem Quepem 1,657 1,562 -5.7%
9 Velinga Ponda 1,921 1,820 -5.3%
10 Vanelim Salcete 1,860 1,848 -0.7%
11 Molcarnem Quepem 1,507 1,509 +0.1%
12 Pirla Quepem 474 475 +0.2%
13 Sangod Dharbandora 1,083 1,089 +0.6%
14 Vagurbem Ponda 527 530 +0.6%
15 Vichundrem Sanguem 775 780 +0.7%
16 Molem Dharbandora 1,715 1,727 +0.7%
17 Rivona Sanguem 3,621 3,657 +1.0%
18 Piliem Dharbandora 4,058 4,099 +1.0%
19 Nagvem Quepem 475 481 +1.3%
20 Cansaulim Mormugao 2,219 2,251 +1.4%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 3 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 3 excluded in total. How the limits are set.