GaonData

Biggest population changes in Banas Kantha district

Computed from 947 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Banas Kantha district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Begadiyavas Danta 1,080 2,639 +144.3%
2 Kamalpura Vadgam 215 500 +132.6%
3 Radha Nesda Vav 1,732 3,994 +130.6%
4 Ranpur Tharad 892 2,000 +124.2%
5 Rabadi Padar Vav 668 1,400 +109.6%
6 Harde Vasana Vadgam 2,075 4,294 +106.9%
7 Baradvi Vav 498 994 +99.6%
8 Ratanpura Tharad 509 1,000 +96.5%
9 Thalvada Danta 622 1,212 +94.9%
10 Mankdi Danta 2,316 4,510 +94.7%
11 Maidkol Kankrej 1,816 3,500 +92.7%
12 Sembal Danta 910 1,740 +91.2%
13 Jotada Kankrej 596 1,136 +90.6%
14 Vasna (Kuda) Lakhani 2,278 4,250 +86.6%
15 Garambadi Suigam 2,702 5,000 +85.0%
16 Mera Bhabhar 2,760 5,000 +81.2%
17 Tekari Danta 348 622 +78.7%
18 Pasiya Danta 664 1,180 +77.7%
19 Khimat Dhanera 9,483 16,800 +77.2%
20 Aderan (Danta) Danta 1,194 2,115 +77.1%

Villages that shrank most in Banas Kantha district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Vagda Palanpur 4,885 3,215 -34.2%
2 Mumanvas Vadgam 4,528 3,160 -30.2%
3 Mokeshvar Vadgam 281 200 -28.8%
4 Ravel Deodar 3,368 2,421 -28.1%
5 Samla Vadana Deodar 1,680 1,250 -25.6%
6 Dhanpura Vadgam 401 300 -25.2%
7 Boda Deodar 328 250 -23.8%
8 Bhakhari Vav 2,977 2,360 -20.7%
9 Sedla Tharad 2,441 2,000 -18.1%
10 Sesan Juna Deodar 779 650 -16.6%
11 Virpur (Lotol) Danta 418 350 -16.3%
12 Robas Nani Deesa 597 500 -16.3%
13 Salla Palanpur 2,981 2,500 -16.1%
14 Navi Nagari Vadgam 477 400 -16.1%
15 Duchakwada Deodar 3,899 3,400 -12.8%
16 Patosan Palanpur 3,694 3,222 -12.8%
17 Kaleda Vadgam 2,736 2,395 -12.5%
18 Gopalpura Palanpur 279 250 -10.4%
19 Ludara Deodar 4,525 4,225 -6.6%
20 Paldi Vadgam 751 712 -5.2%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 3 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 3 excluded in total. How the limits are set.