GaonData

Biggest population changes in Botad district

Computed from 53 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Botad district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Kapadiyali Barvala 2,961 5,578 +88.4%
2 Timbla Barvala 193 312 +61.7%
3 Raypar Gadhada 540 840 +55.6%
4 Nabhoi Barvala 804 1,235 +53.6%
5 Tatam Gadhada 6,003 8,600 +43.3%
6 Kundal Barvala 1,959 2,755 +40.6%
7 Polarpur Barvala 2,048 2,632 +28.5%
8 Zinzavadar Botad 2,006 2,550 +27.1%
9 Turkha Botad 5,889 7,250 +23.1%
10 Pipariya Barvala 120 145 +20.8%
11 Rampura Barvala 3,229 3,746 +16.0%
12 Dhinkwali Botad 1,276 1,477 +15.8%
13 Bela Barvala 2,813 3,250 +15.5%
14 Targhara Botad 4,297 4,900 +14.0%
15 Khamidana Barvala 1,555 1,770 +13.8%
16 Bhambhan Botad 4,274 4,800 +12.3%
17 Limboda Botad 2,101 2,332 +11.0%
18 Tajpar Botad 4,224 4,654 +10.2%
19 Vadhela Barvala 1,363 1,500 +10.1%
20 Bhadravadi Botad 4,582 4,971 +8.5%

Villages that shrank most in Botad district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Samadhiyala Gadhada 1,203 1,150 -4.4%
2 Navda Barvala 6,164 6,100 -1.0%
3 Malanpur Ranpur 2,584 2,583 -0.0%
4 Charanki Ranpur 1,751 1,755 +0.2%
5 Mota Umarda Gadhada 1,403 1,407 +0.3%
6 Kerala Gadhada 2,550 2,560 +0.4%
7 Piparadi Botad 2,365 2,375 +0.4%
8 Nana Bhadla Botad 2,950 2,965 +0.5%
9 Dhankaniya Botad 2,230 2,245 +0.7%
10 Sajeli Botad 134 135 +0.8%
11 Aniyali Kasbati Ranpur 1,635 1,648 +0.8%
12 Jalalpur Gadhada 4,950 5,000 +1.0%
13 Nana Umarda Gadhada 1,660 1,680 +1.2%
14 Ratanvav Botad 1,876 1,900 +1.3%
15 Sangavadar Botad 1,214 1,230 +1.3%
16 Keriya No.2 Botad 1,783 1,810 +1.5%
17 Samadhiyala No.1 Botad 4,775 4,852 +1.6%
18 Babarkot Botad 1,379 1,403 +1.7%
19 Vajeli Botad 167 170 +1.8%
20 Hadadad Botad 6,388 6,511 +1.9%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 1 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 1 excluded in total. How the limits are set.