GaonData

Biggest population changes in Dang district

Computed from 257 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Dang district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Iskhandi Subir 365 909 +149.0%
2 Chichpada (Vadpada) Subir 233 576 +147.2%
3 Moti Jhadadar Subir 255 630 +147.1%
4 Karanjpada Subir 222 540 +143.2%
5 Dumarya Subir 103 248 +140.8%
6 Ghana Subir 755 1,781 +135.9%
7 Moti Kasad Subir 400 937 +134.3%
8 Karanjda (Lavchalisaja) Subir 265 613 +131.3%
9 Satbabla Subir 286 659 +130.4%
10 Ghubita Ahwa 481 1,106 +129.9%
11 Hanwatpada(Pipaldahadsaja) Subir 795 1,825 +129.6%
12 Chikhli (Lavchalisaja) Subir 395 905 +129.1%
13 Polasmal Subir 471 1,070 +127.2%
14 Gaygothan Subir 435 984 +126.2%
15 Diwan Tembrun Ahwa 709 1,572 +121.7%
16 Chinchvihir Subir 492 1,084 +120.3%
17 Jamanvihir Ahwa 420 918 +118.6%
18 Daher Subir 881 1,919 +117.8%
19 Jogthawa Subir 233 490 +110.3%
20 Gurudiya Subir 286 599 +109.4%

Villages that shrank most in Dang district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Jhavda Waghai 1,258 1,040 -17.3%
2 Malegaon Ahwa 1,935 1,646 -14.9%
3 Vanzat Amba Waghai 707 618 -12.6%
4 Dodipada Waghai 497 455 -8.4%
5 Barda (Manmodisaja) Waghai 1,052 974 -7.4%
6 Bhenskatri Waghai 1,310 1,220 -6.9%
7 Dokpatal Waghai 929 920 -1.0%
8 Subir Subir 3,188 3,166 -0.7%
9 Divadyawan Waghai 664 665 +0.1%
10 Sarwar Waghai 1,116 1,119 +0.3%
11 Kalibel Waghai 1,695 1,707 +0.7%
12 Isdar(Borkhalsaja) Ahwa 448 452 +0.9%
13 Chichinagaontha Waghai 1,150 1,162 +1.0%
14 Kudkas Waghai 809 821 +1.5%
15 Koylipada Waghai 1,031 1,048 +1.6%
16 Nadagkhadi Ahwa 1,230 1,251 +1.7%
17 Chinchpada (Galkundsaja) Ahwa 609 620 +1.8%
18 Chikar (Jhavdasaja) Waghai 1,530 1,560 +2.0%
19 BARDA Waghai 764 779 +2.0%
20 Kosimpatal Waghai 319 326 +2.2%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 3 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 3 excluded in total. How the limits are set.