GaonData

Biggest population changes in Gandhinagar district

Computed from 47 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Gandhinagar district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Lodra Mansa 7,723 12,000 +55.4%
2 Paldi Rathod Mansa 621 940 +51.4%
3 Dingucha Kalol 3,284 4,590 +39.8%
4 Parsa Mansa 3,218 4,250 +32.1%
5 Khadiya Dehgam 966 1,255 +29.9%
6 Lavad Dehgam 5,501 7,125 +29.5%
7 Chekhlapagi Dehgam 3,884 5,000 +28.7%
8 Vasan Gandhinagar 3,995 5,043 +26.2%
9 Patanpura Mansa 1,276 1,594 +24.9%
10 Rampura (M) Mansa 1,964 2,450 +24.8%
11 Varsoda Mansa 2,241 2,720 +21.4%
12 Boru Mansa 5,085 6,167 +21.3%
13 Amarapur Mansa 1,653 2,000 +21.0%
14 Amaja Kalol 3,035 3,630 +19.6%
15 Jindva Dehgam 4,100 4,900 +19.5%
16 Hajipur Kalol 3,918 4,675 +19.3%
17 Jakhora Gandhinagar 2,199 2,481 +12.8%
18 Pundarasan Gandhinagar 2,615 2,878 +10.1%
19 Dharisana Dehgam 4,311 4,720 +9.5%
20 Vankanerda Gandhinagar 1,686 1,825 +8.2%

Villages that shrank most in Gandhinagar district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Galthara Mansa 2,827 1,995 -29.4%
2 Kuvadara Mansa 2,335 1,680 -28.1%
3 Bilodra Mansa 7,580 6,512 -14.1%
4 Solaiya Mansa 4,282 3,905 -8.8%
5 Titoda Gandhinagar 7,144 6,519 -8.8%
6 Paldi Vyas Mansa 2,465 2,390 -3.0%
7 Kharna Mansa 2,989 2,990 +0.0%
8 Antoli Dehgam 1,494 1,495 +0.1%
9 Bahiyel Dehgam 10,575 10,600 +0.2%
10 Ranchhodpura Kalol 1,175 1,178 +0.3%
11 Adraj Moti Gandhinagar 9,355 9,385 +0.3%
12 Gunma Mansa 554 556 +0.4%
13 Indrapura Mansa 2,130 2,138 +0.4%
14 Dhanaj Kalol 2,333 2,348 +0.6%
15 Dhameda Mansa 3,895 3,950 +1.4%
16 Lakroda Mansa 3,210 3,262 +1.6%
17 Dantali Kalol 940 960 +2.1%
18 Khata Amba Mansa 2,436 2,524 +3.6%
19 Vardhana Muvada Dehgam 1,245 1,300 +4.4%
20 Rangpur Mansa 2,217 2,317 +4.5%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 0 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 0 excluded in total. How the limits are set.