GaonData

Biggest population changes in Kachchh district

Computed from 222 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Kachchh district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Kalyanpar Rapar 1,426 2,960 +107.6%
2 Ludiya Bhuj 2,009 4,125 +105.3%
3 Vadzar Bhuj 425 800 +88.2%
4 Nabhoi Mandvi 123 220 +78.9%
5 Adesar Rapar 8,325 14,570 +75.0%
6 Virani Mandvi 1,430 2,500 +74.8%
7 Jangi Bhachau 4,713 8,000 +69.7%
8 Nokhaniya Bhuj 755 1,268 +68.0%
9 Bara Abdasa 356 579 +62.6%
10 Shinay Gandhidham 4,345 7,000 +61.1%
11 Devpar Nakhatrana 3,005 4,778 +59.0%
12 Bharudia Bhachau 2,451 3,867 +57.8%
13 Chobari Bhachau 8,000 12,520 +56.5%
14 Kanaiyabe Bhuj 1,496 2,298 +53.6%
15 Bag Mandvi 2,956 4,500 +52.2%
16 Mandvi (Rural) Mandvi 1,233 1,850 +50.0%
17 Kanthkot Bhachau 2,498 3,735 +49.5%
18 Kunaria Nana-Mota Bhuj 1,662 2,468 +48.5%
19 Bhadai Moti Mandvi 1,171 1,700 +45.2%
20 Samakhiari Bhachau 10,402 15,070 +44.9%

Villages that shrank most in Kachchh district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Rajpar Timbo Mandvi 233 150 -35.6%
2 Tharavada Mota Bhuj 566 400 -29.3%
3 Gamdau Bhachau 661 500 -24.4%
4 Asarani Mandvi 218 170 -22.0%
5 Vrajvani Rapar 1,531 1,210 -21.0%
6 Adhochhani Nakhatrana 114 101 -11.4%
7 Nirona Nakhatrana 5,710 5,135 -10.1%
8 Nagalpar Nakhatrana 602 569 -5.5%
9 Chandroda Anjar 2,471 2,371 -4.0%
10 Goyla Abdasa 525 510 -2.9%
11 Nanavada Abdasa 377 368 -2.4%
12 Nandhra Nana Abdasa 112 110 -1.8%
13 Filon Mandvi 188 185 -1.6%
14 Anandsar Bhuj 1,340 1,329 -0.8%
15 Mau Moti Mandvi 3,327 3,300 -0.8%
16 Bhadali Nakhatrana 1,298 1,288 -0.8%
17 Lohariya Mota Anjar 1,021 1,016 -0.5%
18 Raydhanpar Bhuj 1,114 1,110 -0.4%
19 Somani Vandh Rapar 1,287 1,286 -0.1%
20 Ravapar (Navavas) Nakhatrana 4,584 4,585 +0.0%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 7 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 7 excluded in total. How the limits are set.