GaonData

Biggest population changes in Narmada district

Computed from 47 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Narmada district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Nana Suka Amba Dediyapada 1,117 1,560 +39.7%
2 Namariya Tilakwada 962 1,285 +33.6%
3 Chhindiapara Garudeshwar 717 900 +25.5%
4 Kanpor Nandod 214 262 +22.4%
5 Zadoli Dediyapada 188 230 +22.3%
6 Mota Suka Amba Dediyapada 2,026 2,430 +19.9%
7 Rel Nandod 322 382 +18.6%
8 Chitrol Nandod 225 266 +18.2%
9 Khudadi Dediyapada 1,513 1,750 +15.7%
10 Mojra Dediyapada 443 508 +14.7%
11 Kaltar Dediyapada 531 602 +13.4%
12 Vaviala Garudeshwar 1,719 1,895 +10.2%
13 Rambhava Dediyapada 714 781 +9.4%
14 Rakhas Kundi Dediyapada 680 739 +8.7%
15 Rozanar (Dhamanghoda) Tilakwada 409 439 +7.3%
16 Dholivav Nandod 345 365 +5.8%
17 Mayasi Nandod 271 286 +5.5%
18 Panisadadia Garudeshwar 366 386 +5.5%
19 Bal Dediyapada 1,078 1,128 +4.6%
20 Kantharpura Tilakwada 1,223 1,273 +4.1%

Villages that shrank most in Narmada district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Khajali Dabda Dediyapada 1,862 1,137 -38.9%
2 Dabhed Tilakwada 594 410 -31.0%
3 Ringni Nandod 687 546 -20.5%
4 Relva Dediyapada 912 731 -19.9%
5 Mandala Dediyapada 2,847 2,575 -9.6%
6 Mora Tilakwada 218 198 -9.2%
7 Nana Dor Amba Sagbara 731 678 -7.3%
8 Sahebpura Tilakwada 576 546 -5.2%
9 Sabuti Dediyapada 1,083 1,032 -4.7%
10 Vasan Tilakwada 925 900 -2.7%
11 Moriya Tilakwada 513 512 -0.2%
12 Fatepur (Vajiriya) Tilakwada 1,019 1,018 -0.1%
13 Nivalda Dediyapada 2,414 2,416 +0.1%
14 Vavdi Nandod 2,475 2,478 +0.1%
15 Sorapada Sagbara 1,798 1,801 +0.2%
16 Kankhadi Sagbara 709 711 +0.3%
17 Rengan Tilakwada 1,716 1,723 +0.4%
18 Pankhala Sagbara 1,333 1,339 +0.5%
19 Ghankhetar Dediyapada 796 800 +0.5%
20 Rajuvadia Nandod 2,664 2,685 +0.8%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 0 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 0 excluded in total. How the limits are set.