Biggest population changes in Panch Mahals district
Computed from 173 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Panch Mahals district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Medapur | 1,552 | 3,737 | +140.8% |
| 2 | Limbodra | 2,405 | 5,215 | +116.8% |
| 3 | Raisingpura | 512 | 1,038 | +102.7% |
| 4 | Gajapura | 667 | 1,275 | +91.2% |
| 5 | Tajpur | 1,490 | 2,700 | +81.2% |
| 6 | Balujina Muvada (West) | 2,326 | 3,848 | +65.4% |
| 7 | Katadia | 1,301 | 2,077 | +59.6% |
| 8 | Mangalpur | 2,207 | 3,500 | +58.6% |
| 9 | Dhanol | 1,216 | 1,866 | +53.5% |
| 10 | Vanta Vachhoda | 1,858 | 2,823 | +51.9% |
| 11 | Chundadi | 574 | 825 | +43.7% |
| 12 | Varvada | 2,510 | 3,546 | +41.3% |
| 13 | Jalam Bariana Muvada | 948 | 1,305 | +37.7% |
| 14 | Pasnal | 1,084 | 1,490 | +37.5% |
| 15 | Chhanip | 820 | 1,127 | +37.4% |
| 16 | Sudhara | 233 | 315 | +35.2% |
| 17 | Mor | 2,274 | 3,000 | +31.9% |
| 18 | Kuberpura | 439 | 565 | +28.7% |
| 19 | Zoz | 1,568 | 2,003 | +27.7% |
| 20 | Dabhan | 400 | 508 | +27.0% |
Villages that shrank most in Panch Mahals district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ambali | 5,441 | 3,420 | -37.1% |
| 2 | Karoli | 10,237 | 6,888 | -32.7% |
| 3 | Ratanpur (Kantdi) | 5,609 | 3,833 | -31.7% |
| 4 | Guneli | 8,885 | 6,220 | -30.0% |
| 5 | Adadra | 6,997 | 4,949 | -29.3% |
| 6 | Khudra | 3,069 | 2,287 | -25.5% |
| 7 | Nasirpur (Metral) | 293 | 220 | -24.9% |
| 8 | Bakrol | 6,018 | 4,596 | -23.6% |
| 9 | Kakara Dungri | 861 | 660 | -23.3% |
| 10 | Kabirpur | 1,960 | 1,600 | -18.4% |
| 11 | Rinchhiya | 714 | 599 | -16.1% |
| 12 | Dharapur | 3,025 | 2,576 | -14.8% |
| 13 | Bedhiya | 8,348 | 7,304 | -12.5% |
| 14 | Chopda Khurd | 1,339 | 1,200 | -10.4% |
| 15 | Kankodakui | 914 | 846 | -7.4% |
| 16 | Motal | 1,076 | 1,036 | -3.7% |
| 17 | Chandpur | 2,193 | 2,188 | -0.2% |
| 18 | Nathkuva | 2,042 | 2,041 | -0.1% |
| 19 | Moryo | 1,744 | 1,745 | +0.1% |
| 20 | Jetpur | 1,544 | 1,545 | +0.1% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
0 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
0 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.