GaonData

Biggest population changes in Patan district

Computed from 65 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Patan district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Bamroli Santalpur 2,716 5,716 +110.5%
2 Unrot Santalpur 1,104 2,200 +99.3%
3 Loteshvar Sankheshwar 815 1,549 +90.1%
4 Kalana Harij 804 1,515 +88.4%
5 Rampura Sami 1,381 2,380 +72.3%
6 Pirojpura Sankheshwar 1,451 2,487 +71.4%
7 Santhli Radhanpur 1,819 3,057 +68.1%
8 Nani Chandur Sami 3,006 5,000 +66.3%
9 Adiya Harij 3,569 5,230 +46.5%
10 Korda Santalpur 3,998 5,500 +37.6%
11 Sonar Sami 1,053 1,400 +33.0%
12 Maghapura Radhanpur 2,055 2,706 +31.7%
13 Masali Radhanpur 2,493 3,240 +30.0%
14 Kamalpur Chanasma 720 920 +27.8%
15 Volavi Saraswati 317 402 +26.8%
16 Vaval Sami 1,045 1,300 +24.4%
17 Kanij Sami 2,401 2,980 +24.1%
18 Sami Sami 12,591 15,270 +21.3%
19 Tornipur Harij 529 630 +19.1%
20 Kumbhana Harij 1,149 1,361 +18.4%

Villages that shrank most in Patan district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Kanchanpura Sankheshwar 980 623 -36.4%
2 Manka (Juna-Nava) Harij 4,859 3,215 -33.8%
3 Nayta Saraswati 6,846 5,714 -16.5%
4 Nayka Sami 3,228 3,080 -4.6%
5 Hamirpura Santalpur 1,312 1,311 -0.1%
6 Mandotri Patan 2,038 2,039 +0.1%
7 Abiyana Santalpur 2,520 2,530 +0.4%
8 Kharchariya Sami 1,205 1,215 +0.8%
9 Baspa Sami 3,069 3,096 +0.9%
10 Kanosan Saraswati 2,477 2,499 +0.9%
11 Dadka Sami 821 830 +1.1%
12 Sukhpura Sami 730 740 +1.4%
13 Dadar Sami 2,020 2,050 +1.5%
14 Gujarvada Sami 1,593 1,620 +1.7%
15 Dhadhana Sami 2,261 2,300 +1.7%
16 Nana Joravarpura Sami 741 754 +1.8%
17 Dudkha Sami 4,929 5,020 +1.9%
18 Dantarvada Harij 1,679 1,712 +2.0%
19 Fatehpura Sankheshwar 737 752 +2.0%
20 Vadli Patan 2,138 2,183 +2.1%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 0 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 0 excluded in total. How the limits are set.