GaonData

Biggest population changes in Surendranagar district

Computed from 412 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Surendranagar district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Sudamda Sayla 8,286 18,250 +120.3%
2 Velavadar Chuda 1,001 2,000 +99.8%
3 Sorimbhda Sayla 612 1,162 +89.9%
4 Vana Lakhtar 2,838 5,100 +79.7%
5 Kherva Dasada 3,107 5,523 +77.8%
6 Padiwada Dasada 1,395 2,476 +77.5%
7 Raysangpar Muli 2,321 4,100 +76.7%
8 Chobari Chotila 2,253 3,822 +69.6%
9 Salkhada Chotila 918 1,544 +68.2%
10 Shekhpar Muli 3,049 4,800 +57.4%
11 Vanod Dasada 5,276 8,250 +56.4%
12 Mahidad Chotila 762 1,180 +54.9%
13 Sidhsar Dasada 506 780 +54.1%
14 Amnagar Dasada 359 550 +53.2%
15 Manavada Dasada 1,651 2,500 +51.4%
16 Chanpar Muli 876 1,320 +50.7%
17 Gundiyavada Sayla 1,426 2,125 +49.0%
18 Nani Majethi Dasada 796 1,172 +47.2%
19 Enjar Dhrangadhra 3,591 5,250 +46.2%
20 Surajpura Dasada 838 1,220 +45.6%

Villages that shrank most in Surendranagar district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Sakhpar Chotila 188 135 -28.2%
2 Devaliya Lakhtar 1,620 1,420 -12.3%
3 Savda Dasada 1,711 1,530 -10.6%
4 Nagadka Dasada 783 718 -8.3%
5 Jagdishan Dasada 200 194 -3.0%
6 Sadla Dasada 1,415 1,384 -2.2%
7 Hathipura Dasada 375 369 -1.6%
8 Malvan Dasada 1,333 1,322 -0.8%
9 Balala Chuda 1,227 1,226 -0.1%
10 Vadiya Sayla 1,928 1,929 +0.1%
11 Gediya Dasada 1,980 1,982 +0.1%
12 Dhama Dasada 1,952 1,955 +0.1%
13 Jarvala Dasada 1,667 1,670 +0.2%
14 Limbad Dasada 1,067 1,071 +0.4%
15 Surai Chotila 1,306 1,311 +0.4%
16 Muli Muli 9,191 9,230 +0.4%
17 Kathada Dasada 1,922 1,930 +0.4%
18 Dharaie Chotila 2,762 2,776 +0.5%
19 Gadhechi Chotila 912 917 +0.6%
20 Dolatpar Limbdi 358 360 +0.6%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 1 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 1 excluded in total. How the limits are set.