GaonData

Biggest population changes in Tapi district

Computed from 282 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.

OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing

Fastest growing villages in Tapi district

Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Katgadh Vyara 372 824 +121.5%
2 Kukradungri Songadh 568 1,234 +117.3%
3 Vadi Bhensrot Songadh 2,750 5,952 +116.4%
4 Vadgam Uchchhal 601 1,262 +110.0%
5 Vadpada P Umarda Songadh 562 1,060 +88.6%
6 Kakad Kuva P Umarda Songadh 709 1,234 +74.0%
7 Kanchli Uchchhal 260 431 +65.8%
8 Dhaj Uchchhal 349 570 +63.3%
9 Halmundi Dolvan 732 1,195 +63.3%
10 Bedi Songadh 1,496 2,440 +63.1%
11 Chunawadi Dolvan 2,025 3,272 +61.6%
12 Pati Dolvan 5,144 8,231 +60.0%
13 Borikuwa Kukarmunda 454 724 +59.5%
14 Garvan Dolvan 728 1,160 +59.3%
15 Amalpada Songadh 1,299 1,905 +46.6%
16 Pathakwadi Dolvan 2,242 3,197 +42.6%
17 Besaniya Dolvan 1,329 1,852 +39.4%
18 Borkachchh Dolvan 876 1,220 +39.3%
19 Hiravadi Songadh 1,232 1,711 +38.9%
20 Jhumkathi Kukarmunda 474 658 +38.8%

Villages that shrank most in Tapi district

A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.

#Village Block 20112020Change
1 Shahpor Valod 797 518 -35.0%
2 Kanti Songadh 394 262 -33.5%
3 Raygadh Nizar 7,483 5,593 -25.3%
4 Lakshmi Kheda Nizar 2,556 1,923 -24.8%
5 Virthava Songadh 534 418 -21.7%
6 Bhojpur Dur Dolvan 474 382 -19.4%
7 Ajvar Songadh 162 133 -17.9%
8 Dumda Songadh 2,164 1,794 -17.1%
9 Amania Dolvan 818 710 -13.2%
10 Shahpur Vyara 661 577 -12.7%
11 Maiyali Songadh 737 644 -12.6%
12 Veldha Vyara 553 510 -7.8%
13 Vajharda Songadh 2,405 2,275 -5.4%
14 Chikhalvav Vyara 1,511 1,470 -2.7%
15 Chhirma Vyara 389 379 -2.6%
16 Khanpur Vyara 1,122 1,097 -2.2%
17 Indu Vyara 976 958 -1.8%
18 Umarvav Najik Dolvan 2,484 2,444 -1.6%
19 Rampura Kothar Songadh 260 256 -1.5%
20 Chikhli Uchchhal 4,625 4,578 -1.0%
What this ranking leaves out, and why. 3 villages here had fewer than 100 people in 2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village, so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or −40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is 3 excluded in total. How the limits are set.