Biggest population changes in Ambala district
Computed from 392 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Ambala district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Panjauri (101) | 606 | 1,500 | +147.5% |
| 2 | Dhamauli Uparli (276) | 457 | 1,048 | +129.3% |
| 3 | Kalal Majra (282) | 813 | 1,850 | +127.5% |
| 4 | Nek Nawan (108) | 354 | 800 | +126.0% |
| 5 | Shahzadpur (58) | 7,278 | 15,000 | +106.1% |
| 6 | Tandwal (62) | 1,232 | 2,500 | +102.9% |
| 7 | Rao Majra (312) | 514 | 1,040 | +102.3% |
| 8 | Matehri Jattan (120) | 940 | 1,850 | +96.8% |
| 9 | Rattangarh Urf Nakatpur (296) | 168 | 325 | +93.5% |
| 10 | Jagatpur (310) | 148 | 275 | +85.8% |
| 11 | Tolanwali (234) | 187 | 310 | +65.8% |
| 12 | Dhamauli Bichli (277) | 942 | 1,534 | +62.9% |
| 13 | Segti (306) | 439 | 706 | +60.8% |
| 14 | Samru (42) | 338 | 542 | +60.4% |
| 15 | Tasrauli (35) | 1,252 | 2,000 | +59.7% |
| 16 | Barnala (Part)(48) | 2,184 | 3,400 | +55.7% |
| 17 | Mardon (252) | 772 | 1,200 | +55.4% |
| 18 | Bharanpur (61) | 392 | 600 | +53.1% |
| 19 | Bego Majra (181) | 392 | 600 | +53.1% |
| 20 | Thakar Pura (15) | 2,079 | 3,140 | +51.0% |
Villages that shrank most in Ambala district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nau Gawan (122) | 1,517 | 1,000 | -34.1% |
| 2 | Hamidpur (86) | 1,818 | 1,206 | -33.7% |
| 3 | Tobha (20) | 2,251 | 1,565 | -30.5% |
| 4 | Hamayupur (179) | 1,615 | 1,126 | -30.3% |
| 5 | Mianpur (84) | 950 | 667 | -29.8% |
| 6 | Bapauli (259) | 1,278 | 900 | -29.6% |
| 7 | Gazipur (27) | 1,265 | 900 | -28.9% |
| 8 | Badhauli (110) | 4,442 | 3,275 | -26.3% |
| 9 | Manglai (129) | 2,203 | 1,630 | -26.0% |
| 10 | Laha (72) | 627 | 470 | -25.0% |
| 11 | Nagauli (72) | 825 | 619 | -25.0% |
| 12 | Gola (16) | 2,560 | 1,962 | -23.4% |
| 13 | Nahawani (92) | 3,067 | 2,366 | -22.9% |
| 14 | Bibipur (59) | 1,225 | 950 | -22.4% |
| 15 | Barola (276) | 1,276 | 990 | -22.4% |
| 16 | Bilaspur (258) | 1,510 | 1,200 | -20.5% |
| 17 | Paplotha (91) | 1,181 | 955 | -19.1% |
| 18 | Kalal Majri (261) | 675 | 550 | -18.5% |
| 19 | Harbon (123) | 1,147 | 951 | -17.1% |
| 20 | Jandheri (323) | 1,796 | 1,498 | -16.6% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
4 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
4 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.