Biggest population changes in Faridabad district
Computed from 102 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Faridabad district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jajru(52) | 2,677 | 6,500 | +142.8% |
| 2 | Kanwara(156) | 1,659 | 3,900 | +135.1% |
| 3 | Raipur Kalan(180) | 1,120 | 2,500 | +123.2% |
| 4 | Karnera(42) | 2,091 | 4,277 | +104.5% |
| 5 | Chandpur(190) | 2,766 | 5,600 | +102.5% |
| 6 | Phophunda(68) | 537 | 1,063 | +98.0% |
| 7 | Mohna(204) | 9,843 | 18,474 | +87.7% |
| 8 | Phulera(165) | 595 | 1,112 | +86.9% |
| 9 | Mahmoodpur(107) | 1,029 | 1,900 | +84.7% |
| 10 | Bukharpur(85) | 2,331 | 4,200 | +80.2% |
| 11 | Khandawali(50) | 4,181 | 7,500 | +79.4% |
| 12 | Tilori Khadar(164) | 428 | 750 | +75.2% |
| 13 | Sunper(72) | 2,353 | 4,054 | +72.3% |
| 14 | Kirawali(148) | 425 | 729 | +71.5% |
| 15 | Mozza Mabad Majra Sekhpur(176) | 153 | 250 | +63.4% |
| 16 | Fatehpur tagga(29) | 7,592 | 12,350 | +62.7% |
| 17 | Amipur(172) | 1,415 | 2,300 | +62.5% |
| 18 | Sarurpur(27) | 2,001 | 3,245 | +62.2% |
| 19 | Naryala(63) | 2,855 | 4,550 | +59.4% |
| 20 | Tikri Khera(31) | 2,541 | 4,000 | +57.4% |
Villages that shrank most in Faridabad district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gharora(181) | 2,028 | 1,300 | -35.9% |
| 2 | Tigaon(95) | 19,668 | 12,880 | -34.5% |
| 3 | Kail Gaon(51) | 1,085 | 786 | -27.6% |
| 4 | Atali(89) | 6,640 | 5,060 | -23.8% |
| 5 | Mahavatpur(154) | 982 | 756 | -23.0% |
| 6 | Dayalpur(86) | 7,350 | 5,784 | -21.3% |
| 7 | Fattupura(101) | 1,313 | 1,036 | -21.1% |
| 8 | Shahjahanpur(189) | 2,393 | 2,000 | -16.4% |
| 9 | Sidhola(168) | 2,054 | 2,000 | -2.6% |
| 10 | Ladoli(70) | 2,225 | 2,200 | -1.1% |
| 11 | Qureshipur(24) | 2,166 | 2,165 | -0.1% |
| 12 | Shahpur Kalan(71) | 2,393 | 2,400 | +0.3% |
| 13 | Dhouj(17) | 14,297 | 14,500 | +1.4% |
| 14 | Selakhari(18) | 972 | 990 | +1.9% |
| 15 | Narhawali(66) | 2,934 | 3,000 | +2.3% |
| 16 | Dadsiya(147) | 1,866 | 1,941 | +4.0% |
| 17 | Deeg(56) | 4,291 | 4,500 | +4.9% |
| 18 | Ahmadpur(62) | 911 | 968 | +6.3% |
| 19 | Chirsi(171) | 1,193 | 1,294 | +8.5% |
| 20 | Pali(13) | 7,767 | 8,450 | +8.8% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
2 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
2 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.