Biggest population changes in Gurugram district
Computed from 134 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Gurugram district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Telpuri(23) | 793 | 1,875 | +136.4% |
| 2 | Ratiaka(210) | 224 | 512 | +128.6% |
| 3 | Gugana(4) | 837 | 1,850 | +121.0% |
| 4 | Tripari(20) | 1,322 | 2,862 | +116.5% |
| 5 | Badshahpur Tethar(222) | 744 | 1,607 | +116.0% |
| 6 | Satlaka(217) | 1,053 | 2,200 | +108.9% |
| 7 | Mangwaki(11) | 675 | 1,361 | +101.6% |
| 8 | Nurgarh(12) | 1,822 | 3,204 | +75.8% |
| 9 | Bidhwaka(218) | 208 | 350 | +68.3% |
| 10 | Alimudinpur(11) | 1,818 | 3,025 | +66.4% |
| 11 | Tajnagar(30) | 2,695 | 4,203 | +56.0% |
| 12 | Ghausgarh(26) | 3,413 | 5,219 | +52.9% |
| 13 | Behlpa(171) | 2,095 | 3,035 | +44.9% |
| 14 | Kuliaka(219) | 908 | 1,242 | +36.8% |
| 15 | Ranika Singhola (215) | 559 | 750 | +34.2% |
| 16 | Saidpur Mohammadpur (117) | 2,205 | 2,881 | +30.7% |
| 17 | Kharkhari(131) | 1,907 | 2,485 | +30.3% |
| 18 | Fazalpur Badli(31) | 2,310 | 3,001 | +29.9% |
| 19 | Kaliawas(41) | 1,926 | 2,445 | +26.9% |
| 20 | Faredpur(15) | 1,222 | 1,547 | +26.6% |
Villages that shrank most in Gurugram district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Patli (34) | 4,070 | 2,480 | -39.1% |
| 2 | Jori(24) | 3,063 | 2,265 | -26.1% |
| 3 | Bohara Kalan(134) | 18,961 | 18,980 | +0.1% |
| 4 | Khandewla(21) | 3,940 | 3,947 | +0.2% |
| 5 | Budhera(43) | 3,779 | 3,786 | +0.2% |
| 6 | Mao(297) | 2,265 | 2,270 | +0.2% |
| 7 | Sadhrana(45) | 3,083 | 3,090 | +0.2% |
| 8 | Sultanpur(39) | 3,956 | 3,967 | +0.3% |
| 9 | Jhanjrola(38) | 3,011 | 3,020 | +0.3% |
| 10 | Chandla Dungerwas(148) | 1,997 | 2,003 | +0.3% |
| 11 | Mubarikpur(37) | 2,944 | 2,953 | +0.3% |
| 12 | Bhudka(142) | 1,493 | 1,498 | +0.3% |
| 13 | Uncha Majra(43) | 3,857 | 3,870 | +0.3% |
| 14 | Bas Padamka (41) | 3,338 | 3,350 | +0.4% |
| 15 | Muzaffra (262) | 1,464 | 1,470 | +0.4% |
| 16 | Ghamroj(179) | 4,797 | 4,817 | +0.4% |
| 17 | Mankrola(42) | 2,378 | 2,388 | +0.4% |
| 18 | Sidhrawali(139) | 5,506 | 5,530 | +0.4% |
| 19 | Mushedpur(6) | 1,539 | 1,546 | +0.5% |
| 20 | Baslambi(130) | 2,685 | 2,698 | +0.5% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
1 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
1 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.