Biggest population changes in Jind district
Computed from 290 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Jind district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sarfabad (34) | 934 | 1,800 | +92.7% |
| 2 | Paju Khurd (44) | 2,091 | 4,000 | +91.3% |
| 3 | Anchra Kalan (35) | 2,781 | 5,200 | +87.0% |
| 4 | Udepur (102) | 2,750 | 5,110 | +85.8% |
| 5 | Khapran (112) | 2,882 | 5,200 | +80.4% |
| 6 | Bhongra (111) | 3,449 | 6,200 | +79.8% |
| 7 | Mandi Kalan (71) | 3,721 | 6,545 | +75.9% |
| 8 | Khera Gandawala (127) | 2,286 | 4,000 | +75.0% |
| 9 | Nehra (81) | 1,170 | 2,037 | +74.1% |
| 10 | Dhamtan Sahib (60) | 12,750 | 22,100 | +73.3% |
| 11 | Raichandwala (90) | 2,932 | 5,019 | +71.2% |
| 12 | Chhattar (76) | 12,095 | 19,800 | +63.7% |
| 13 | Paju Kalan (46) | 3,452 | 5,500 | +59.3% |
| 14 | Kahna Khera (69) | 1,297 | 2,050 | +58.1% |
| 15 | Baroda (113) | 8,595 | 13,500 | +57.1% |
| 16 | Durjanpur (101) | 4,618 | 7,200 | +55.9% |
| 17 | Dhanauri (6) | 11,929 | 18,512 | +55.2% |
| 18 | Pahlwan (114) | 4,132 | 6,400 | +54.9% |
| 19 | Gohian (88) | 1,504 | 2,326 | +54.6% |
| 20 | Khanda (87) | 3,620 | 5,543 | +53.1% |
Villages that shrank most in Jind district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ahlanjogi Khera (60) | 1,295 | 912 | -29.6% |
| 2 | Bahbalpur (52) | 1,780 | 1,620 | -9.0% |
| 3 | Kandela (90) | 7,381 | 6,750 | -8.6% |
| 4 | Karsola (40) | 6,058 | 5,549 | -8.4% |
| 5 | Gosain Khera (60) | 2,107 | 1,952 | -7.4% |
| 6 | Malar (25) | 2,966 | 2,828 | -4.7% |
| 7 | Rojhla (40) | 1,531 | 1,480 | -3.3% |
| 8 | Frain Khurd (79) | 878 | 850 | -3.2% |
| 9 | Karkhana (39) | 2,791 | 2,722 | -2.5% |
| 10 | Karsindhu (56) | 1,372 | 1,360 | -0.9% |
| 11 | Ponkar Kheri (10) | 3,616 | 3,620 | +0.1% |
| 12 | Gangoli (13) | 5,579 | 5,602 | +0.4% |
| 13 | Roopgarh (88) | 4,205 | 4,225 | +0.5% |
| 14 | Nidana (66) | 4,334 | 4,356 | +0.5% |
| 15 | Singhpura (53) | 2,887 | 2,904 | +0.6% |
| 16 | Amarheri (80) | 4,298 | 4,325 | +0.6% |
| 17 | Dhathrath (91) | 8,795 | 8,856 | +0.7% |
| 18 | Loan (59) | 5,083 | 5,126 | +0.8% |
| 19 | Ghaso Khurd (118) | 2,176 | 2,200 | +1.1% |
| 20 | Jhanj Khurd (85) | 2,240 | 2,265 | +1.1% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
1 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
1 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.