Biggest population changes in Kaithal district
Computed from 238 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Kaithal district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kakeor (62) | 1,041 | 2,509 | +141.0% |
| 2 | Santokh Majra (49) | 1,117 | 2,610 | +133.7% |
| 3 | Kotra (53) | 3,973 | 8,558 | +115.4% |
| 4 | Umedpur (82) | 347 | 697 | +100.9% |
| 5 | Berad (125) | 219 | 429 | +95.9% |
| 6 | Balwanti (32) | 1,874 | 3,569 | +90.5% |
| 7 | Pinjupura(31) | 2,025 | 3,560 | +75.8% |
| 8 | Kultaran (27) | 2,402 | 4,000 | +66.5% |
| 9 | Kakot (5) | 6,018 | 10,000 | +66.2% |
| 10 | Sangri (59) | 3,561 | 5,910 | +66.0% |
| 11 | Majra Nand Karan (51) | 3,163 | 5,243 | +65.8% |
| 12 | Pabnawa (20) | 10,644 | 17,100 | +60.6% |
| 13 | Jaswanti (31) | 2,312 | 3,700 | +60.0% |
| 14 | Rasulpur (65) | 2,949 | 4,639 | +57.3% |
| 15 | Kathana (61) | 9,293 | 14,102 | +51.8% |
| 16 | Harnola (79) | 649 | 976 | +50.4% |
| 17 | Habri(31)_ | 10,702 | 16,000 | +49.5% |
| 18 | Keorak (33) | 14,051 | 21,000 | +49.5% |
| 19 | Songal (50) | 6,079 | 9,000 | +48.0% |
| 20 | Paharpur (80) | 1,222 | 1,809 | +48.0% |
Villages that shrank most in Kaithal district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bhunna (74) | 7,736 | 5,004 | -35.3% |
| 2 | Sadarheri (126) | 1,510 | 1,120 | -25.8% |
| 3 | Deohera (29) | 4,954 | 3,700 | -25.3% |
| 4 | Dheraru (16) | 1,240 | 940 | -24.2% |
| 5 | Sultanian (114) | 2,546 | 1,938 | -23.9% |
| 6 | Kawartan (64) | 3,749 | 2,983 | -20.4% |
| 7 | Jakholi (56) | 9,053 | 7,700 | -14.9% |
| 8 | Khushhal Majra (Part) (124) | 1,486 | 1,296 | -12.8% |
| 9 | Kutabpur (16) | 2,414 | 2,138 | -11.4% |
| 10 | Kasaur (102) | 1,952 | 1,747 | -10.5% |
| 11 | Kamheri (26) | 1,648 | 1,488 | -9.7% |
| 12 | Baupur (131) | 1,850 | 1,706 | -7.8% |
| 13 | Mehmudpur (4) | 916 | 850 | -7.2% |
| 14 | Theh Mukerian (75) | 843 | 787 | -6.6% |
| 15 | Dhodh Kheri (39) | 1,962 | 1,859 | -5.3% |
| 16 | Buchi (33) | 2,091 | 1,987 | -5.0% |
| 17 | Simla (32) | 4,371 | 4,180 | -4.4% |
| 18 | Duserpur (113) | 1,953 | 1,885 | -3.5% |
| 19 | Kharkara (104) | 3,055 | 2,977 | -2.5% |
| 20 | Sair (76) | 2,955 | 2,887 | -2.3% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
2 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
2 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.