Biggest population changes in Mewat district
Computed from 351 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Mewat district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Beri Nisfi Sohna (9) | 740 | 1,845 | +149.3% |
| 2 | Ghagas(2) | 3,224 | 8,000 | +148.1% |
| 3 | Karhedi(50) | 1,038 | 2,575 | +148.1% |
| 4 | Sumahra(222) | 2,093 | 5,150 | +146.1% |
| 5 | Mandikhera(53) | 2,765 | 6,800 | +145.9% |
| 6 | Tundlaka(172) | 1,524 | 3,740 | +145.4% |
| 7 | Khori Nuh (116) | 189 | 453 | +139.7% |
| 8 | Neemkhera(147) | 1,670 | 3,995 | +139.2% |
| 9 | Atitka(38) | 301 | 712 | +136.5% |
| 10 | Santhawari(55) | 2,007 | 4,712 | +134.8% |
| 11 | Khori(146) | 456 | 1,058 | +132.0% |
| 12 | Uleta(6) | 1,630 | 3,770 | +131.3% |
| 13 | Kurali Sohna(89) | 1,822 | 4,210 | +131.1% |
| 14 | Sulela (75) | 697 | 1,600 | +129.6% |
| 15 | Sonkh(100) | 1,735 | 3,925 | +126.2% |
| 16 | Alduka (203) | 3,787 | 8,500 | +124.5% |
| 17 | Hasanpur Nuh(16) | 1,382 | 3,100 | +124.3% |
| 18 | Khedli Khurd(65) | 1,736 | 3,890 | +124.1% |
| 19 | Chhapra (167) | 1,151 | 2,578 | +124.0% |
| 20 | Chitora(116) | 1,166 | 2,600 | +123.0% |
Villages that shrank most in Mewat district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kiranj(187) | 2,955 | 2,100 | -28.9% |
| 2 | Bilhaka(191) | 111 | 80 | -27.9% |
| 3 | Khori Shah Chokha(177) | 7,379 | 6,050 | -18.0% |
| 4 | Manota(158) | 2,120 | 1,750 | -17.4% |
| 5 | Dungeja(137) | 2,978 | 2,500 | -16.1% |
| 6 | Gudhi (29) | 1,459 | 1,366 | -6.4% |
| 7 | Gogjaka (75) | 1,173 | 1,100 | -6.2% |
| 8 | Jharpuri(135) | 2,583 | 2,456 | -4.9% |
| 9 | Rehna(95) | 3,643 | 3,595 | -1.3% |
| 10 | Jaitalaka(136) | 1,598 | 1,665 | +4.2% |
| 11 | Cheela(67) | 3,755 | 3,920 | +4.4% |
| 12 | Marora(38) | 4,585 | 4,800 | +4.7% |
| 13 | Bharangpur(45) | 1,395 | 1,480 | +6.1% |
| 14 | Dadu(10) | 667 | 719 | +7.8% |
| 15 | Gwarka (65) | 2,084 | 2,250 | +8.0% |
| 16 | Biwan(98) | 957 | 1,038 | +8.5% |
| 17 | Fatehpur (30) | 885 | 960 | +8.5% |
| 18 | Godhola (174) | 3,642 | 3,976 | +9.2% |
| 19 | Kalarpuri(42) | 1,001 | 1,100 | +9.9% |
| 20 | Mohlaka(123) | 1,632 | 1,800 | +10.3% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
1 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
1 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.