Biggest population changes in Palwal district
Computed from 218 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Palwal district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gorauta(120) | 4,855 | 12,000 | +147.2% |
| 2 | Tikri Gujar(144) | 1,979 | 4,800 | +142.6% |
| 3 | Gailpur(33) | 1,783 | 4,310 | +141.7% |
| 4 | Ali Meo(284) | 10,795 | 26,000 | +140.8% |
| 5 | Bhud(194) | 635 | 1,500 | +136.2% |
| 6 | Bata(142) | 1,996 | 4,700 | +135.5% |
| 7 | Jainpur(220) | 1,007 | 2,350 | +133.4% |
| 8 | Ratipur(75) | 1,828 | 4,200 | +129.8% |
| 9 | Durenchi(210) | 1,426 | 3,250 | +127.9% |
| 10 | Sundhad(89) | 12,048 | 27,000 | +124.1% |
| 11 | Bhimsika(271) | 2,118 | 4,620 | +118.1% |
| 12 | Babupur Hathin(263) | 1,429 | 3,100 | +116.9% |
| 13 | Rehrana(81) | 2,701 | 5,820 | +115.5% |
| 14 | Lalwa(71) | 1,152 | 2,470 | +114.4% |
| 15 | Andhrola(236) | 3,283 | 7,020 | +113.8% |
| 16 | Patli Kalan(39) | 252 | 537 | +113.1% |
| 17 | Balai(180) | 1,797 | 3,800 | +111.5% |
| 18 | Wali Mohammadpur(106) | 1,419 | 3,000 | +111.4% |
| 19 | Mankaka(260) | 711 | 1,500 | +111.0% |
| 20 | Nangal Jat(286) | 4,851 | 10,221 | +110.7% |
Villages that shrank most in Palwal district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kalwaka(6) | 3,284 | 2,256 | -31.3% |
| 2 | Solra(189) | 4,683 | 3,350 | -28.5% |
| 3 | Sailothi (154) | 3,603 | 2,699 | -25.1% |
| 4 | Saroli(188) | 2,002 | 1,520 | -24.1% |
| 5 | Pelak(168) | 3,565 | 3,060 | -14.2% |
| 6 | Jatoli(114) | 3,662 | 3,200 | -12.6% |
| 7 | Amarpur(177) | 1,388 | 1,295 | -6.7% |
| 8 | Tikri Brahman(82) | 6,063 | 6,080 | +0.3% |
| 9 | Manduri(218) | 1,932 | 1,942 | +0.5% |
| 10 | Kakripur(54) | 1,060 | 1,070 | +0.9% |
| 11 | Maholi(103) | 1,632 | 1,653 | +1.3% |
| 12 | Khatela Sarai(86) | 8,830 | 9,000 | +1.9% |
| 13 | Ali Brahman(285) | 1,812 | 1,850 | +2.1% |
| 14 | Ghori(183) | 7,287 | 7,450 | +2.2% |
| 15 | Malikgani(164) | 653 | 668 | +2.3% |
| 16 | Tikri Alias Bhupgarh(130) | 1,414 | 1,450 | +2.5% |
| 17 | Bhurja(10) | 1,244 | 1,285 | +3.3% |
| 18 | Bagpur Kalan(191) | 4,515 | 4,700 | +4.1% |
| 19 | Pingaltu(119) | 4,315 | 4,500 | +4.3% |
| 20 | Kanwarka(133) | 1,773 | 1,850 | +4.3% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
1 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
1 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.