Biggest population changes in Panipat district
Computed from 163 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Panipat district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Baholi (12) | 1,553 | 3,610 | +132.4% |
| 2 | Chhichhrana (55) | 3,458 | 7,700 | +122.7% |
| 3 | Raimal (76) | 631 | 1,380 | +118.7% |
| 4 | Urlana Kalan (51) | 8,759 | 19,000 | +116.9% |
| 5 | Matnauli (75) | 953 | 2,000 | +109.9% |
| 6 | Risalu (18) | 3,722 | 7,570 | +103.4% |
| 7 | Nara (6) | 6,668 | 13,486 | +102.3% |
| 8 | Raja Kheri (25) | 4,988 | 10,000 | +100.5% |
| 9 | Wazirpur Tatyana (73) | 2,451 | 4,860 | +98.3% |
| 10 | Jatipur (67) | 4,198 | 8,125 | +93.5% |
| 11 | Tajpur (65) | 1,950 | 3,740 | +91.8% |
| 12 | Sutana (23) | 6,268 | 12,000 | +91.5% |
| 13 | Nurpur Mughla (48) | 1,064 | 2,000 | +88.0% |
| 14 | Nanhera (57) | 2,271 | 4,200 | +84.9% |
| 15 | Bursham (35) | 4,664 | 8,500 | +82.3% |
| 16 | Begumpur Tahrpur (63) | 725 | 1,284 | +77.1% |
| 17 | Diwana (33) | 3,413 | 6,000 | +75.8% |
| 18 | Rasulpur (43) | 1,749 | 3,070 | +75.5% |
| 19 | Atta (80) | 7,710 | 12,846 | +66.6% |
| 20 | Alupur (60) | 2,860 | 4,750 | +66.1% |
Villages that shrank most in Panipat district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mahali (23) | 1,837 | 1,198 | -34.8% |
| 2 | Tamsabad (29) | 1,853 | 1,299 | -29.9% |
| 3 | Kiwana (78) | 8,136 | 6,550 | -19.5% |
| 4 | Karhans (69) | 6,438 | 5,253 | -18.4% |
| 5 | Kundla (94) | 4,041 | 3,362 | -16.8% |
| 6 | Luhari (42) | 3,576 | 3,074 | -14.0% |
| 7 | Bhainswal (7) | 1,512 | 1,314 | -13.1% |
| 8 | Kaith (91) | 1,717 | 1,554 | -9.5% |
| 9 | Jurasi Saraf Khas (72) | 5,577 | 5,090 | -8.7% |
| 10 | Palheri (46) | 1,893 | 1,778 | -6.1% |
| 11 | Mahoti (89) | 4,825 | 4,548 | -5.7% |
| 12 | Mandi (82) | 7,454 | 7,038 | -5.6% |
| 13 | Raksehra (91) | 6,476 | 6,257 | -3.4% |
| 14 | Boana Lakhu (86) | 7,169 | 7,000 | -2.4% |
| 15 | Seenk (52) | 6,219 | 6,127 | -1.5% |
| 16 | Gawalra (81) | 3,494 | 3,484 | -0.3% |
| 17 | Nizampur (3) | 1,649 | 1,648 | -0.1% |
| 18 | Garh Sanrai (38) | 3,393 | 3,399 | +0.2% |
| 19 | Barana (44) | 7,402 | 7,422 | +0.3% |
| 20 | Palri (70) | 3,961 | 4,000 | +1.0% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
2 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
2 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.