Biggest population changes in Rohtak district
Computed from 118 villages where both counts are usable. Nobody publishes this ranking; it is not in either source.
OverviewBiggest changesSchool staffing
Fastest growing villages in Rohtak district
Ranked by the change between the Census 2011 count and the 2020 Mission Antyodaya survey.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gorawar(97) | 7,927 | 18,000 | +127.1% |
| 2 | Sanghi(83) | 9,108 | 18,000 | +97.6% |
| 3 | Katesra(118) | 4,595 | 9,000 | +95.9% |
| 4 | Nasirpur(77) | 556 | 987 | +77.5% |
| 5 | Ghilor Khurd(86) | 872 | 1,525 | +74.9% |
| 6 | Jindran(87) | 1,518 | 2,650 | +74.6% |
| 7 | Bhaini Bharon(122) | 3,877 | 6,205 | +60.0% |
| 8 | Muradpur Tekna(100) | 2,097 | 3,295 | +57.1% |
| 9 | Taja Majra(95) | 1,307 | 2,040 | +56.1% |
| 10 | Samar Gopalpur(90) | 6,109 | 9,500 | +55.5% |
| 11 | Kisranti(47) | 1,952 | 3,010 | +54.2% |
| 12 | Taimurpur(113) | 463 | 710 | +53.4% |
| 13 | Dataur(45) | 3,607 | 5,450 | +51.1% |
| 14 | Gaddi Kheri(97) | 2,690 | 4,050 | +50.6% |
| 15 | Bahu Akberpur(94) | 11,120 | 16,550 | +48.8% |
| 16 | Samchana(28) | 6,326 | 9,350 | +47.8% |
| 17 | Rithal Phogat(76) | 6,201 | 9,000 | +45.1% |
| 18 | Sunderpur(91) | 3,848 | 5,520 | +43.5% |
| 19 | Maroudi Jatan(103) | 2,136 | 3,000 | +40.5% |
| 20 | Gugaheri(111) | 1,713 | 2,405 | +40.4% |
Villages that shrank most in Rohtak district
A falling count usually means out-migration, but in a small village it can also mean a boundary change.
| # | Village | 2011 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chandi(93) | 5,569 | 3,385 | -39.2% |
| 2 | Bhaini Surjan(116) | 5,950 | 3,635 | -38.9% |
| 3 | Singhpura(92) | 3,680 | 2,669 | -27.5% |
| 4 | Maham (Rural)(Part)(120) | 7,578 | 5,810 | -23.3% |
| 5 | Kharkhra(104) | 7,395 | 5,955 | -19.5% |
| 6 | Dhamar(62) | 4,551 | 3,821 | -16.0% |
| 7 | Nindana(107) | 12,760 | 11,232 | -12.0% |
| 8 | Sasrauli(78) | 999 | 902 | -9.7% |
| 9 | Nonond(43) | 3,207 | 3,020 | -5.8% |
| 10 | Assan(56) | 4,295 | 4,144 | -3.5% |
| 11 | Mungan(55) | 2,785 | 2,693 | -3.3% |
| 12 | Farmana Badshahpur(112) | 3,619 | 3,500 | -3.3% |
| 13 | Ghuskani(86) | 1,544 | 1,495 | -3.2% |
| 14 | Ajaib(108) | 6,217 | 6,118 | -1.6% |
| 15 | Rurki(54) | 6,372 | 6,280 | -1.4% |
| 16 | Sahan Majra(81) | 152 | 150 | -1.3% |
| 17 | Jassia(82) | 6,700 | 6,640 | -0.9% |
| 18 | Naya Bans(33) | 3,085 | 3,087 | +0.1% |
| 19 | Hassangarh(29) | 6,535 | 6,540 | +0.1% |
| 20 | Titoli(88) | 10,177 | 10,188 | +0.1% |
What this ranking leaves out, and why.
0 villages here had fewer than 100 people in
2011 — at that size a percentage says more about the surveyor than the village,
so they are excluded. A further 0 sit within half a
point of the limits beyond which we treat a figure as implausible (+150% or
−40%): they are the villages that only just survived that test, not the fastest
moving, and ranking them first would be misleading. That is
0 excluded in total.
How the limits are set.